Big changes are happening and bigger changes will happen soon all due to technology. The information age helped us reach what is being seen as a technological revolution and we are currently living through it. 1/6

More 👇🏻

Within a few years, there's going to be major changes in how we live our lives:

Public transportation being replaced by the likes of Uber.

Apartment and hotel rentals being replaced by the likes of AirBnB. 2/6

More 👇🏻
Restaurants being replaced by the likes of Deliveroo/Zomato.

Retail shopping being replaced by the likes of Amazon.

Traditional vehicle driving replaced by autonomous vehicles.

Internet file sharing being replaced by the likes of Bittorrent. 3/6

More 👇🏻
Traditional farming being replaced by robots.

Paralegal and medical research/diagnosis being replaced by AI.

Manufacturing being replaced by 3D printing.

ISPs being replaced by free worldwide wireless Internet. 4/6

More 👇🏻
Wholesale shipping being replaced by the likes of Alibaba.

Movie theaters and movie rentals being replaced by the likes of Netflix/Hulu.

Finance being replaced by #bitcoin.
5/6

More 👇🏻
All these things are happening as we speak. They along with future technology, will slowly take over almost everything in our lives.

One thing that is abundantly clear is that governments and banking institutions will not be part of the revolution.
6/6 (end)

More from Tech

There has been a lot of discussion about negative emissions technologies (NETs) lately. While we need to be skeptical of assumed planetary-scale engineering and wary of moral hazard, we also need much greater RD&D funding to keep our options open. A quick thread: 1/10

Energy system models love NETs, particularly for very rapid mitigation scenarios like 1.5C (where the alternative is zero global emissions by 2040)! More problematically, they also like tons of NETs in 2C scenarios where NETs are less essential.
https://t.co/M3ACyD4cv7 2/10


In model world the math is simple: very rapid mitigation is expensive today, particularly once you get outside the power sector, and technological advancement may make later NETs cheaper than near-term mitigation after a point. 3/10

This is, of course, problematic if the aim is to ensure that particular targets (such as well-below 2C) are met; betting that a "backstop" technology that does not exist today at any meaningful scale will save the day is a hell of a moral hazard. 4/10

Many models go completely overboard with CCS, seeing a future resurgence of coal and a large part of global primary energy occurring with carbon capture. For example, here is what the MESSAGE SSP2-1.9 scenario shows: 5/10

You May Also Like

I'm going to do two history threads on Ethiopia, one on its ancient history, one on its modern story (1800 to today). 🇪🇹

I'll begin with the ancient history ... and it goes way back. Because modern humans - and before that, the ancestors of humans - almost certainly originated in Ethiopia. 🇪🇹 (sub-thread):


The first likely historical reference to Ethiopia is ancient Egyptian records of trade expeditions to the "Land of Punt" in search of gold, ebony, ivory, incense, and wild animals, starting in c 2500 BC 🇪🇹


Ethiopians themselves believe that the Queen of Sheba, who visited Israel's King Solomon in the Bible (c 950 BC), came from Ethiopia (not Yemen, as others believe). Here she is meeting Solomon in a stain-glassed window in Addis Ababa's Holy Trinity Church. 🇪🇹


References to the Queen of Sheba are everywhere in Ethiopia. The national airline's frequent flier miles are even called "ShebaMiles". 🇪🇹
Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q