#Nifty
March20 low of 7511, taking 75 days trading cycle , here's an observation
The low or high made on each 75th day, when crossed and closed above/below it , market has moved in that direction for the next 75 days, happened twice so far, next such date to watchout is 16 Feb.
More from Prashant Bhansali
1. Type the code of these two scripts exactly as shown in TV without any space and use NSE before it
NSE:MARUTI/NSE:CNXAUTO
2. Press enter
(10) Ratio chart (daily) of Auto Index/Nifty
— Prashant Bhansali (@prashant280294) June 5, 2021
Taking multiple support at crucial level
Autos could start outperformance over nifty as long the support holds , and more fiercely once resistance breached #PB365 pic.twitter.com/ZRSmtGH1ic
@Digital_Baba
Not looking good.
#RELIANCE update
— Prashant Bhansali (@prashant280294) April 28, 2022
Was expecting 5th wave rally towards 2800-3000 as mentioned in previous post
Move played out, but now not worth chasing anymore
Not saying the move is over, it can still go up bit more, but riskreward not good for positional longs now on, I would stay away. https://t.co/eoLshLoLBD pic.twitter.com/G0qZAEBRIX
More from Stocklearnings
Found awesome content: ⏬
1. Moneycontrol
2. Bank nifty Strangles/Straddles
3. Learnings
4. Expiry Trading
5. Directional trading
6. Long Term Investing
7. Pivot system
8. DHS pattern
9. Multiple trade management threads/ways.
Moneycontrol article on @sourabhsiso19
@moneycontrolcom did a detailed story on my trading journey.
— Sourabh Sisodiya, CFA (@sourabhsiso19) May 26, 2020
But many couldn\u2019t read it as it needed a pro-subscription.
So here\u2019s a blog on the same :https://t.co/dwN2xieUKd#trading #journey #quant #options #algotrading #markets #OptionsTrading
What Sourabh does and how to trade like him?
Getting many DM\u2019s on how I can learn and trade like you.
— Sourabh Sisodiya, CFA (@sourabhsiso19) January 10, 2020
To be a succesful trader one needs an edge
My edge:
1)focus on selected instruments (Banknifty majorly and few stocks)
2) backtested my strategies historically (for past 10years)
(1)
Why trade multiple systems? ⏬
1. Keeps drawdown at minimum.
2. Strong money management can be applied.
3. Better psychology.
Do I trade only BNF ?
— Sourabh Sisodiya, CFA (@sourabhsiso19) March 4, 2020
Other than BNF intraday , I run few other systems too.
1) Intraday Momentum
2) Positional systems
3) Vol Crush Trade etc
Goal of system trading is to run few non-correlated strategies together so that system drawdown is at the minimum.#trading #systems pic.twitter.com/mS8jFEaLUW
Thread on how options allow you to change your positions in a dynamic manner.
Options Thread
— Sourabh Sisodiya, CFA (@sourabhsiso19) December 7, 2019
How options allows to change and adjust view dynamically.
Let\u2019s understand with a live example.
Example : Nifty is at 11921 and you are bullish on Nifty.
1) Buy Naked 11900 CE(call) at 167
Breakeven : 12068
Max Loss : Rs 12555
Max Profit : Unlimited pic.twitter.com/TXMhh5HWsd
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?