🗼 At less than 0.8 times Price/Sales, growth of 25% cagr in the last 3yrs
🗼 Capitalise the fiberization wave in 🇬🇧
🗼Has customer relationships with tier 1 telcos.
Sterlite Tech: Stable (Low Base)
🗼Rev up 49% YoY, 18% EBITDA margin, Pat of 116cr (vs 6cr)
🗼 Order book at 11.2Kcr
🗼 Successful field trials for programmable FTTx
🗼 New R&D facility in 🇬🇧 & Optical Fiber cable facility in 🇺🇸 committed to
#Q1withJST #Telecom
More from JST Investments
Key insights from Hikal
🧪 Lowered interest rates
🧪 Pharma: Growth in generics as well as CDMO
🧪 Crop Protection: Scaleup of a fungicide for a Japanese CDMO client
🧪 Healthy pipeline of new products: Supported by new capacities; Investing in Animal Health & Biocides verticals https://t.co/D70j9oriCa
🧪 Lowered interest rates
🧪 Pharma: Growth in generics as well as CDMO
🧪 Crop Protection: Scaleup of a fungicide for a Japanese CDMO client
🧪 Healthy pipeline of new products: Supported by new capacities; Investing in Animal Health & Biocides verticals https://t.co/D70j9oriCa
Hikal: Strong
— JST Investments (@JstInvestments) August 5, 2021
\U0001f9ea Rev up 27% YoY
\U0001f9ea 22% EBITDA margin
\U0001f9ea Pat of 50crs
\U0001f9ea Growth across both pharmaceuticals & crop protection.#Q1withJST #Pharma pic.twitter.com/8lFo68KzPe
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
