1/ I feel like breaking some rules today. Let's get transparent and have an open discussion about management fees in VC to help other emerging managers. The standard fee structure is 2% the size of the fund every year for 10 years or the life of the fund.

#vc #startups #funding

2/ This means if you are an emerging manager raising a micro/nano fund of let's say $10M, then you get $200K a year for operations. That $200K pays for legal, fund admin, accounting, expenses, and your salary. basically that 2% doesn't go very far

#vc #startups #funding
3/ This is in contrast to a larger fund, let's say $100M fund where 2% is $2M a year. This is why some LPs (those who invest in funds) are looking for smaller management fee which is unreasonable for micro funds which many diverse managers are raising

#vc #startups #funding
4/ Now at RareBreed Ventures we structured our fees to be 2.5% for the first 5 years and 1.5% for the last 5 years. This comes out to the standard 2% but front-loaded in earlier years

#vc #startups #funding
5/ This means when we hit our target of $10M (if you want to be an LP our min investment is 10K and you can go to https://t.co/dm6ywrNFnU). We'll have 250K for the first 5 years giving a little more cushion for operations and allowing me to bring on a hire

#vc #startups #funding
6/ That seemed like the best option for me because it still keeps the fees at 2% overall and we are essentially making the bet that in 3 years or so we'll raise fund 2 which will be larger (our goal is $50M)

#vc #startups #funding
7/ The important thing to note here is the raising of new funds every 3 or so years. in our case let's say we close a $50M fund with the standard 2% fees in year 4 of our fund 1. Then we will be getting fees from both fund 1 & fund 2 which make life easier

#vc #startups #funding
8/ To this point @Nivo0o0 from @ShrugCap gave me some of the best advice ever and I wish I had gotten it earlier in my fundraising journey

#vc #startups #funding
9/ Basically @Nivo0o0 suggested front-loading the management to 4% but then only taking fees for the first 4 year. This leads to lower fees over the full 10 years while giving you more money to work with when getting started

#vc #startups #funding
10/ His point with this is if you do what you say you will, you'll raise fund 2, and then you won't need the fees from fund 1 anymore. I think this is really smart and appealing to LPs because its less fees overall and more money for investments

#vc #startups #funding
11/ I'd love to hear other thoughts on this topic so we can educate other emerging managers.@Samirkaji @DSox @davidrgoldberg @ceonyc @chudson @johnhenrystyle @MyDailyPosts @Jai__Malik @jasonlk @roybahat @PDXStephenG @minal_hasan @dunkhippo33 @yoheinakajima

#vc #startups #funding

More from Startups

You May Also Like

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?