1/ I feel like breaking some rules today. Let's get transparent and have an open discussion about management fees in VC to help other emerging managers. The standard fee structure is 2% the size of the fund every year for 10 years or the life of the fund.

#vc #startups #funding

2/ This means if you are an emerging manager raising a micro/nano fund of let's say $10M, then you get $200K a year for operations. That $200K pays for legal, fund admin, accounting, expenses, and your salary. basically that 2% doesn't go very far

#vc #startups #funding
3/ This is in contrast to a larger fund, let's say $100M fund where 2% is $2M a year. This is why some LPs (those who invest in funds) are looking for smaller management fee which is unreasonable for micro funds which many diverse managers are raising

#vc #startups #funding
4/ Now at RareBreed Ventures we structured our fees to be 2.5% for the first 5 years and 1.5% for the last 5 years. This comes out to the standard 2% but front-loaded in earlier years

#vc #startups #funding
5/ This means when we hit our target of $10M (if you want to be an LP our min investment is 10K and you can go to https://t.co/dm6ywrNFnU). We'll have 250K for the first 5 years giving a little more cushion for operations and allowing me to bring on a hire

#vc #startups #funding
6/ That seemed like the best option for me because it still keeps the fees at 2% overall and we are essentially making the bet that in 3 years or so we'll raise fund 2 which will be larger (our goal is $50M)

#vc #startups #funding
7/ The important thing to note here is the raising of new funds every 3 or so years. in our case let's say we close a $50M fund with the standard 2% fees in year 4 of our fund 1. Then we will be getting fees from both fund 1 & fund 2 which make life easier

#vc #startups #funding
8/ To this point @Nivo0o0 from @ShrugCap gave me some of the best advice ever and I wish I had gotten it earlier in my fundraising journey

#vc #startups #funding
9/ Basically @Nivo0o0 suggested front-loading the management to 4% but then only taking fees for the first 4 year. This leads to lower fees over the full 10 years while giving you more money to work with when getting started

#vc #startups #funding
10/ His point with this is if you do what you say you will, you'll raise fund 2, and then you won't need the fees from fund 1 anymore. I think this is really smart and appealing to LPs because its less fees overall and more money for investments

#vc #startups #funding
11/ I'd love to hear other thoughts on this topic so we can educate other emerging managers.@Samirkaji @DSox @davidrgoldberg @ceonyc @chudson @johnhenrystyle @MyDailyPosts @Jai__Malik @jasonlk @roybahat @PDXStephenG @minal_hasan @dunkhippo33 @yoheinakajima

#vc #startups #funding

More from Startups

.@zapier built a $140M ARR business on $1.4M in VC that has become the logic layer of the no-code industry.

But it has the potential to be something even bigger: the Netflix of productivity.

Our report and a thread 👉

We believe @seqouia and @steadfast got a good deal buying into Zapier at $5B.

We value Zapier at $7B based on:

- 30-50% YoY growth over the next five years
- Zapier’s monopoly status in the solopreneur/SMB market
- 30-40% YoY growth of no-code TAM

No-code is huge and growing, but as @edavidpeterson has written, no-code is about more than tools: it’s about a philosophy that emphasizes interoperability and customizing your software to your needs.

https://t.co/UJY6BRtXwl


.@zapier enabled interoperability by building a solution to one of the intractable problems in SaaS: APIs that don’t talk to each other.

The product took off and hit $100M ARR in just 9 years, comparable to companies that have raised 100x as much money.

https://t.co/0Thk42eRpJ


Zapier was riding an explosion in APIs that started the same year they were founded—2011.

Suddenly, every SaaS business wanted to offer its users extensibility, but not spend time figuring out what integrations to build or building them.

That’s where Zapier came in handy.

You May Also Like