#ZeroCovid doesn't fit with a way of life that doesn't exist anymore.
1. This thread has been given a new lease of life today. People keep saying, "We can't do #ZeroCovid, it doesn't fit with our way of life."
Look around.
What way of life?
The one we used to have?
The UK has been under varying degrees of restriction since March 23rd 2020.
1. \u201c#ZeroCovid is impossible\u201d
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) January 4, 2021
I\u2019ve been arguing for #ZeroCovid before it even had a name, so I\u2019ve heard most of the counter arguments.
It\u2019s too expensive.
If countries like Vietnam can afford it, why can\u2019t we?https://t.co/1XUyzOuHtc
#ZeroCovid doesn't fit with a way of life that doesn't exist anymore.
Simple-minded clod Matt Hancock said Zero Covid is impossible because no country has had zero cases.
Zero Covid sets out an ambition. It signals a country treats any infections as serious incidents.
https://t.co/oNLctulkhM
Unless the UK gets cases down significantly, I'm not sure these measures will be sufficient.
https://t.co/ncrJHwnwMg
https://t.co/ixesiJTLeA
3. And Chris Whitty shared his thoughts on why, how and when restrictions might be lifted. pic.twitter.com/YtERJzhavU
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) January 5, 2021
https://t.co/xhv4gU0k59
4. Instead, it has decided to go a \u2018middle way\u2019, balancing transmission against the economy. This approach is likely to increase negative public health and economic impacts, and the duration of restrictions on personal freedom. pic.twitter.com/NZsyXXhr4Y
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) October 13, 2020
https://t.co/lncKeYzYNe
https://t.co/kdHGRGfEky
1. At today\u2019s #DowningStreetBriefing @SamCoatesSky asked some excellent questions. The PM declined to guarantee children will be back in school before the summer holidays, but he is optimistic measures can be relaxed in spring. pic.twitter.com/uTc29TTgV7
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) January 5, 2021
https://t.co/yYQUbiNqZj
Thoughts on where we are in the UK right now with cases, and the new variant, and what this likely means for the future. And the focus of government solely on vaccination of vulnerable individuals- rather than mitigating transmission. This is short-sighted, and dangerous. Thread
— Deepti Gurdasani (@dgurdasani1) January 8, 2021
Why isn't there greater public outcry for the government to stop gambling on moonshots and longshots, and for it to deliver simple, effective measures that have worked elsewhere?
https://t.co/pK0Vtt8m00
New Zealand has protected its people, its economy and its freedoms.
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) December 20, 2020
Why aren\u2019t more people clamouring for our government to implement policies that have been shown to work?
Look at those crowds.
The prize that awaits those who adopt #ZeroCovid pic.twitter.com/D96OYACXsv
h/t @ViolaPriesemann
https://t.co/WEmuj49Yor
NEW Correspondence\u201480+ researchers warn that a so-called #herdimmunity approach to managing #COVID19 is \u201ca dangerous fallacy unsupported by the scientific evidence\u201d #WCPH2020 https://t.co/2gTtklAkwx pic.twitter.com/q4YNZFJM22
— The Lancet (@TheLancet) October 14, 2020
Worried about Covid spread in your community? YOU can make a difference. Lead a #GreenZone effort with our tools and guidelines. We are here to help everyone achieve #ZeroCovid #ECV https://t.co/fWgKVcEqG3 pic.twitter.com/3FjPRwTDch
— EndCoronaVirus.org (@endCOVID19) October 13, 2020
More from Adam Hamdy
2. Some media commentators seek to present the issue of how to respond to the virus in simplistic terms: Lockdown vs Herd Immunity. This a mischaracterisation. The countries that have tackled #COVID-19 best have used a range of public health
The Swiss Cheese model of #COVID19 defence, by @MackayIM.
— Dr Zo\xeb Hyde (@DrZoeHyde) October 24, 2020
No single measure is sufficient, but put together they can stop the virus.
I particularly like Misinformation Mouse, nibbling away at one of the slices. pic.twitter.com/c1gfTai2Hj
3. Almost every scientist acknowledges lockdown equals failure. It is a sign governments have failed to implement the measures needed to allow life to be lived more or less as normal, without risking exponential growth in transmission.
4. There is an active misinformation campaign that is being aided and abetted by certain sections of the media and some politicians. The campaign would have us believe that if we open up and shield the vulnerable, all will be well. This approach has been derided as inhumane...
5. ...by the WHO, and ridiculous by Dr Fauci for many reasons. It is based on faulty logic, and the proponents of this approach have submitted no evidence that it can be achieved nor any practical examples of how they would do so.
I find it remarkable that a section of society not rejoicing that children very rarely ill with COVID compared to other viruses and much less infectious than adults
— Michael Absoud \U0001f499 (@MAbsoud) February 12, 2021
Instead trying prove the opposite!
Why??
2. @c_drosten has talked about this extensively and @dgurdasani1 and @DrZoeHyde have repeatedly pointed out flaws in the studies which have purported to show this. Now for the other assertion: children are very rarely ill with COVID19.
3. Children seem to suffer less with acute illness, but we have no idea of the long-term impact of infection. We do know #LongCovid affects some children. @LongCovidKids now speaks for 1,500 children struggling with a wide range of long-term symptoms.
4. 1,500 children whose parents found a small campaign group. How many more are out there? We don’t know. ONS data suggests there might be many, but the issue hasn’t been studied sufficiently well or long enough for a definitive answer.
5. Some people have talked about #COVID19 being this generation’s Polio. According to US CDC, Polio resulted in inapparent infection in more than 99% of people. Severe disease occurred in a tiny fraction of those infected. Source:
It seems increasingly likely that, come March, the govt is planning to say to under-65s without pre-existing conditions: go forth and get Covid https://t.co/BhHNG3M2DR
— D_Shariatmadari (@D_Shariatmadari) January 10, 2021
2. Where is the modelling or evidence to support a focused protection vaccination strategy? The government has chosen it as its preferred strategy but it must have considered other options. Will the government publish the data and the alternative options considered?
3. A responsible government will have modelling for 20%, 50% and 80% vaccine coverage, and projections for the number of infections, Long Covid and deaths in each scenario. Where are those models? On what basis has the government opted for the 20% scenario?
4. The government should also have modelled each of these scenarios against a backdrop of low, medium and high community transmission. What is the impact of each vaccination scenario against varying levels of community transmission?
5. There should also be some assessment of incidence of reinfection and likely evolution of variants given different levels of community transmission. What does this assessment tell us?
More from Society
Sarah Wilkinson has a history of Holocaust denial & anti-Jewish hatred dating back (in documented examples) to around 2015.

She is a self-proclaimed British activist for “Palestinian rights” but is more accurately a far Left neo-Nazi. Her son shares the same characteristics of violence, racism & Holocaust denial.
I first documented Sarah Wilkinson’s Holocaust denial back in July 2016. I believe I was the 1st person to do so.
Since then she has produced a long trail of written hate and abuse. See here for a good summary.
The internet is forever. https://t.co/zxBV7rjskB
— Heidi Bachram (@HeidiBachram) February 2, 2021
Wilkinson has recently been publicly celebrated by @XRebellionUK over her latest violent action against a Jewish owned business. Despite many people calling XR’s attention to her history, XR have chosen to remain in alliance with this neo-Nazi.
Former Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell MP is among those who also chose to stand with Wilkinson via a tweet.
But McDonnell is not alone.
Neo-Nazi Sarah Wilkinson is supported and encouraged by thousands of those on the Left who consider themselves “anti-racists”.