#DivisionOfLAbor, we love it! Except it *does* make it a lot harder to provide for our own wants directly. We live by exchanging and cooperating with others. (I.iv.1) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

#AdamSmith is too smart to think all this exchanging and cooperating got worked out easily from the very beginning. There must have been bumps in the road. (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Butchers could have so much meat to trade with bakers/brewers that they could end up with an unusable surplus of bread/beer. That stalls trade. Smart people would work to have a supply of an always-useful trade item on hand. (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
(We, the SmithTweeters, have never encountered a surplus of bread or beer we couldn't handle. But let’s assume Smith knows what he’s talking about.) (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
This is how we get money, folks! We want a stable, always desirable, easily stored, and easily transportable thing we can trade for other stuff! (I.iv.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Cows were probably the earliest form of money, but it’s a lot easier to put coins and bills in your back pocket. Let’s not even talk about making change. (I.iv.3–6) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Many of the things that make a coin a coin were developed to prevent counterfeiting and theft—stamped surfaces, milled edges, and so on. But it’s still easier than weighing out piles of metal. Which is still easier than cows. (I.iv.7–8) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
The minute you get princes and sovereign states involved, you know there’s going to be trouble. They corrupt the currency whenever they can get away with it, says Smith. (I.iv.10) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Now, after casually explaining the origin of money, Smith decides to just go ahead and define value while he’s at it. Why not? Just your average book chapter, really. (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #ValueHowDoesItWork
Value can mean usefulness or value can mean purchasing power. That’s “use value” and “exchange value.” (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #ValueHowDoesItWork
(Oh look! It’s the diamond/water paradox! That’s not famous, or anything. Told you this was just your average book chapter.) (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #ValueHowDoesItWork
Water has high use value. We all need it. But there’s so much of it that it has very little exchange value. Diamonds are the opposite. (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #ValueHowDoesItWork
Would you rather be as necessary as water🌊, or as rare as diamonds💎? (I.iv.13) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
We think it’s very charming when Smith warns everyone that he might be about to get kinda boring, but it’ll all be worth it if you just stick with him. (I.iv.18) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #BuckleUp
“I am always willing to run some hazard of being tedious in order to be sure that I am perspicuous.” It’s okay, Dr. Smith. We are here for the tedium *and* the perspicuity. Bring it! (I.iv.18) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #BuckleUp

More from @AdamSmithWorks

The great thing about #AdamSmith is that when he's about to go off on a 65 page tangent, he warns you. Humans, we bring you the DIGRESSIONS ON SILVER! #OhLawdHeComin #WealthOfTweets

Oh King Edward III, it’s adorable that you think you can just decree that servants and laborers become permanently content with wages fixed at the rate they were at five years ago.
https://t.co/NtOmttquJ3 (I.xi.e.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets


He’s already digressing, and he can’t take a minute to share the menu from that famously magnificent feast with us? (I.xi.e.4–5) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

Super Important 18thC Vocab Geekery: When Smith says the price of the quarter of wheat wasn't “supposed to be < 4 oz silver” he doesn’t mean “shouldn't be.” He means “wasn't thought to be.” He’s not approving of fixed prices. (I.xi.e.7) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

So. Many. Wheat. Prices. (But really, Smith is talking about how much wheat it takes to buy a quantity of silver, NOT how much silver it takes to buy a quantity of wheat.) (I.xi.e.1–14) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

More from Society

You May Also Like

This is NONSENSE. The people who take photos with their books on instagram are known to be voracious readers who graciously take time to review books and recommend them to their followers. Part of their medium is to take elaborate, beautiful photos of books. Die mad, Guardian.


THEY DO READ THEM, YOU JUDGY, RACOON-PICKED TRASH BIN


If you come for Bookstagram, i will fight you.

In appreciation, here are some of my favourite bookstagrams of my books: (photos by lit_nerd37, mybookacademy, bookswrotemystory, and scorpio_books)