male doesn’t produce eggs, he produces the sperm. He’s still the male. If I impregnated a chick then carried the amniotic sac in a backpack ‘til the baby was done I’ll still be male🤦♂️
I’ll address every nonsense argument and lie used to defend the suicidal gender ideology Thats in vogue today:
3:45 - “So what if you don’t have gametes?”
It’s called a birth defect. You’re still male or female.
*one horrible doctor does a horrible thing* "oh I guess gender is horrible" miss me with that transphobic nonsense
— Goob \u26a1 (@Goob999) February 17, 2021
Here's a video to even disprove your take on sex (not gender) and the binary:https://t.co/bpmqqJWoJX
male doesn’t produce eggs, he produces the sperm. He’s still the male. If I impregnated a chick then carried the amniotic sac in a backpack ‘til the baby was done I’ll still be male🤦♂️
No. They’re still producing sperm. They’re males. This is idiotic. Is this whole video like this? (Probably. 99% likely. Abandon hope.)
No. Some animals being hermaphrodites, which is meaningless w/o the existence of binary sex to contrast it to, still doesn’t make gender ideology or transgenderism valid.
Intersex ≠ transgenderism 🙄
Ova-testes in humans are also a disorder, usually found in those w/ the karyotype disorders that you ppl also try to appropriate (extra X’s/Y’s).
The rest of the vid, I guarantee, will go on trying to conflate these things.
Birth defects, which leave you infertile and often require the removal of cancer-prone defective gonads, are not a new sex and have nothing to do with gender theory or transgenderism.
Having a birth defect that causes your body to not react to testosterone so ur male genitals don’t develop & u look like a prepubescent girl for the rest of your life is not a new sex nor transgenderism.
…Duh! Yet none of this has anything to do w/ mental disorders making you want to be a different sex or no sex.
Yes, very informative Mr. Biology Man. Will you ever get to the part where biology justifies any of the claims made by gender ideology?
Birth defects are definitely variations, moron. If you “biological variation” literally makes it so that you cannot pass on your genes via reproduction, it’s a dysfunction. Sorry.
*phew*! Thank G—wait!
Actually, if you’ve gone through puberty the same as 99.9% of the population and are fertile I think you can safely call yourself male or female.
Bullshit. Extra Y & extra X types, though very rare, have been seen enough for categorization, & they never look quite right.
Not in a “that boy is funny looking” kinda way, but in a “is that a boy or a girl? Literally no one can determine, even their genitals are off” kinda way.
More Bullshit!
“Hey, a female mechanic! That’s a gender! A male in a dress? A new gender!”
Worse is using animals with reproductive biology so far removed from us in every way to try to justify simple mental illness.
…Yea. No.
Hormones in the womb are a hell of a drug, but when gender confusion in children is cured at a rate of 80% when puberty is allowed to happen, it doesn’t support your theories.
Aren’t the gender dysphoric suicidal enough already w/ the promotion of enabling the sickness instead of finding solutions?
Again. Nonsense. This is equivalent to arguing about the number of angels that could fit on the point of a pin.
Yes. Lying is easy. The truth is tough, can be ugly. But this why you gender ideologues will always fail. You will never convince many that your worldview is the truth when it’s obvious you HATE truth.
...uhhh, actually, we’re not the ones throwing dresses & makeup on boys just because they’re sissies & don’t act typical. That’s YOU. It’s the basis of your entire argument!
...unless...It’s caused by the mix of mental and developmental disorders found in the gender dysphoric? Hm, yes? Maybe? Possibly?🤔 https://t.co/VryEL7gSFL
It doesn’t work
Mr. Scientist can’t figure this one out but he expects you to trust in the rest of the bullshit he’s spouting.
Get the fuck out!
More from Society
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
