• Price growth drivers were Levetiracetam and Mirtazapine.
• Commercialization of Unit 3 has begun and 2 API have been shipped in.
• Neuland has filed Donepezil based with USDFA.
Neuland Laboratories concall was today at 5:00 PM
@unseenvalue @darshanvmehta1 @drprashantmish6 @punitbansal14 @suru27 @rdkriplani
Hope customer book of Neuland to remain as booked and full just like today's conference call😂
Here are the Key takeaways from the earning call👇
• Price growth drivers were Levetiracetam and Mirtazapine.
• Commercialization of Unit 3 has begun and 2 API have been shipped in.
• Neuland has filed Donepezil based with USDFA.
• Involved in many molecule discovery in generic side
• Co. has seen value on generic capacity, GDS being continuous play for the company
• Co. may have partnership for generic side of business as well.
• Portfolio of PMS project has mix of both orphan and convectional drugs.
• Few molecules of NCE has started generating revenue and benefits of those molecule will be discovered in future.
• Most of the molecules in pipeline has been increased and some are even in commercialization.
• New business momentum continues to remain strong, and lot of business are attracted through referral business.
• More focus remains on the quality of the molecules.
• Neuland has decrease the raw material dependency from China, which was ~60% previously have been brought down to just 10% now which is also for cost competitiveness.
• Current it is fairly underutlize as it has geographical larger side.
• Next 2-3 growth will be from the utilization of the Unit 3.
• Expansion will be based on growth company sees in future.
• Range of utlization stays at 75-80% with that productive plant.
• As unit 3 is not entirely commercialize, operating leverage has not kicked in.
• With more investment and increasing capacity, there will be increase in margin.
• Margin understatement is majorly more because of company wants to be conservative in terms of margins.
CAPEX- Currently company has done 80 crores for expansion and it will same next acquisition for better growth proposition.
• Volatility of the segment is expected to be reduced, as Prime, Speciality, CMS entire segment has received huge growth in the past, resulting in decline in volatility.
More from The Tycoon Mindset
Framework on Buyback covered till now.
This Mega Thread covers our entire thesis on this buyback special situation play, across different sectors & our experience with it.
{Thread of Threads}
🧵👇
Basic of Buyback
Just Dial buyback experience & Notable Learning
Past Case Studies with different learning:
1. TCS Buyback
2. Gandhi Special tubes
This Mega Thread covers our entire thesis on this buyback special situation play, across different sectors & our experience with it.
{Thread of Threads}
🧵👇
Basic of Buyback
BASICS OF Buyback:
— The Tycoon Mindset (@tycoonmindset05) August 31, 2021
This thread is important for every investor who invest in Equity Market
Topics Covered:
1. What is Buyback?
2. Why buyback is important for every investor?
3. How to invest & participate in Buyback?
4. What not to do to avoid Buyback failure?
\U0001f9f5\U0001f447 pic.twitter.com/zR4XPpfU74
Just Dial buyback experience & Notable Learning
Buyback experience:
— The Tycoon Mindset (@tycoonmindset05) September 22, 2020
JustDial buyback just ended. We made a return of ~47% in a quarter by following our Buyback Strategy & technical analysis@gauravgsgs @NeerajMarathe @Prashanth_Krish @mysticfuture @MysticWealth11 @suru27 @tapak7 @stockifi_Invest
Thread of Buyback Play\U0001f447\U0001f9f5
Past Case Studies with different learning:
1. TCS Buyback
Releasing our another piece of buyback analysis on TCS.
— The Tycoon Mindset (@tycoonmindset05) October 11, 2020
Summarizing our article for anyone who wants to have a quick look in our further thread.@shyamsek @SumitResearch @Prakashplutus @tapak7@SanaSecurities @Maaachaaa69 https://t.co/m83G9JZAtN
2. Gandhi Special tubes
Gandhi Special Tubes has come up with buyback at a price of Rs 550. Buyback is ~5% of the total capital.
— The Tycoon Mindset (@tycoonmindset05) July 7, 2021
With higher retail shareholder and promoter participation, Buyback is still lucrative.
Read here, about what's intriguing in this buyback play \U0001f447\U0001f600https://t.co/iKe25GTaYo
More from Society
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
1/ One year of destroyed economies, social isolation & deep social splits calls for an anniversary ⬇️thread ⬇️ to celebrate the RT-qPCR manuscript by Christian Drosten (@c_drosten) & Victor Corman (@vmcorman), submitted on 21st Jan 2020 to @Eurosurveillanc. #UnbiasedScience
2/ Before this very publication, virologists were neither treated like superstars, nor were they considered icons or half-gods. In 2009, Drosten almost succeeded in installing the false premise virology could supersede holistic medical sciences as discussed in this thread.
3/ Drosten is a virologist. He neither has any background in epidemiology, nor has he ever worked in the civil service. He also doesn’t have a background in public health. Yet he and his colleagues affect our daily lives to the level of whom to meet up or how to flush the toilet.
4/ Before January 2020, Drosten and Corman were common virologists at Charité Berlin, whenever they were not involved in economic implications (https://t.co/UTDwG8U7Du). Other than that, they looked at coronaviruses in dromedary calves in the Middle East or Africa. 😍 #cute
5/ Finally in Jan 2020, the published paper laid the theoretical grounds for the current pandemic, the RT-qPCR mass testing-religion, for which he was awarded his second German Federal Cross of Merit (he received the first one in 2005 for developing the SARS-CoV PCR test).
2/ Before this very publication, virologists were neither treated like superstars, nor were they considered icons or half-gods. In 2009, Drosten almost succeeded in installing the false premise virology could supersede holistic medical sciences as discussed in this thread.
3/ Drosten is a virologist. He neither has any background in epidemiology, nor has he ever worked in the civil service. He also doesn’t have a background in public health. Yet he and his colleagues affect our daily lives to the level of whom to meet up or how to flush the toilet.
4/ Before January 2020, Drosten and Corman were common virologists at Charité Berlin, whenever they were not involved in economic implications (https://t.co/UTDwG8U7Du). Other than that, they looked at coronaviruses in dromedary calves in the Middle East or Africa. 😍 #cute
5/ Finally in Jan 2020, the published paper laid the theoretical grounds for the current pandemic, the RT-qPCR mass testing-religion, for which he was awarded his second German Federal Cross of Merit (he received the first one in 2005 for developing the SARS-CoV PCR test).
You May Also Like
1/12
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw
