Through the pandemic, CHS's EBITDA margin never even fell into single digits, and profitability actually *increased* in 2020.
Whatever the other merits of this proposal, funneling another ~$30B to hospitals is the antithesis of "targeted relief."
A dozen hospital chains just presented at #JPM21, two weeks ago.
General theme: Financially speaking, hospitals are doing quite well. 1/n
The new GOP Covid-19 relief offer includes the $20B that Biden asked for on vaccine distribution, and also calls for $35 billion in new grants for hospitals and health providers that wasn't included in Biden's plan pic.twitter.com/DMjVPahc64
— Rachel Cohrs (@rachelcohrs) February 1, 2021
Through the pandemic, CHS's EBITDA margin never even fell into single digits, and profitability actually *increased* in 2020.
They finished the year with ~$440M of EBITDA, and $2.3B of cash on hand.
That's about $600M more than they had pre-pandemic.
That number is *up* by ~$2B from the start of the pandemic, which is quite something.
And, like every other chain in this thread, Northwell ended up with a healthier balance sheet than at the beginning of the crisis.
Not clear why they need $6.2 billion of cash on hand (4x their total debt), but they have it, which must be nice.
And...yup! Cash upon cash. Spectrum's cash pile increased by a quarter (~$1B) in the year to September.
Why?
SSM enjoyed revenue growth in 2020, and currently sits on a tidy pile of $4.4 billion.
Another hospital chain, with $11B of cash on hand, and a nice healthy profit margin.
More from Society
2/ Before this very publication, virologists were neither treated like superstars, nor were they considered icons or half-gods. In 2009, Drosten almost succeeded in installing the false premise virology could supersede holistic medical sciences as discussed in this thread.
3/ Drosten is a virologist. He neither has any background in epidemiology, nor has he ever worked in the civil service. He also doesn’t have a background in public health. Yet he and his colleagues affect our daily lives to the level of whom to meet up or how to flush the toilet.
4/ Before January 2020, Drosten and Corman were common virologists at Charité Berlin, whenever they were not involved in economic implications (https://t.co/UTDwG8U7Du). Other than that, they looked at coronaviruses in dromedary calves in the Middle East or Africa. 😍 #cute
5/ Finally in Jan 2020, the published paper laid the theoretical grounds for the current pandemic, the RT-qPCR mass testing-religion, for which he was awarded his second German Federal Cross of Merit (he received the first one in 2005 for developing the SARS-CoV PCR test).
these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.
this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.
let's look.
above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.
we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.
this is devastating to the case for NPI.
clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.
barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.
this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.
there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.
this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.
everyone got the same R
this methodology is a little complex, so let me explain what i did.
— el gato malo (@boriquagato) May 30, 2020
a few EU countries provide real day of death data. this lets us plot meaningful curves to show rate of disease change.
what struck me is how similar all the curves were.
everyone got the same shape. pic.twitter.com/bN0hILzoSl
Conservatives are using the Texas power chaos to argue against climate policy even as fossil-generated power outages dwarf the amount of renewables knocked offline during the historic deep freeze. President Biden and progressives have been slow to respond.https://t.co/UajKhptEAU
— E&E News (@EENewsUpdates) February 17, 2021
It relied on very little wind energy - that was the plan. It relied on a lot of natural gas - that was the plan. It relied on all of its nuclear energy - that was the plan. 2/x
There was enough natural gas, coal and nuclear capacity installed to survive this event - it was NOT "forced out" by the wind energy expansion. It was there. 3/x
Wind, natural gas, coal and nuclear plants all failed to deliver on their expectations for long periods of time. The biggest gap was in natural gas! The generators were there, but they were not able to deliver. 4/x
It may be fair to ask why there is so much wind energy in ERCOT if we do NOT expect it to deliver during weather events like this, but that is an entirely different question - and one with a lot of great answers!! 5/x