https://t.co/23L4wz5ppW
— Ahmed Aznil (@AhmedAznil) January 21, 2021
https://t.co/9V3aEjaF30
Here's @GiliLankanfushi resort GM and his staff destroying a beautiful sand bank because the locals from Himmafushi island are utilizing the sandbank for their happiness too.
— Ahmed Aznil (@AhmedAznil) January 21, 2021
Hats off to the guys who caught these people red handed.@epamaldives @presidencymv @Mausoom_Maus pic.twitter.com/y2iEmcIemj
— Ahmed Aznil (@AhmedAznil) January 21, 2021
@presidencymv @DrHussainHassan @MohamedNasheed @matatoMV @matimaldivesmv @MoTmv @visitmaldives pic.twitter.com/fHEW6NzYK9
— Ahmed Aznil (@AhmedAznil) January 21, 2021
— Ahmed Aznil (@AhmedAznil) January 21, 2021
https://t.co/VihDKhMHK8
In association with @PoliceMv, we are currently attending a reported incident where a group of people have dug a narrow channel/trench on a small sandbank located to the west of Himmafushi. pic.twitter.com/nf0dvlTpdb
— EPA Maldives (@EPAMaldives) January 22, 2021
Thank You For Reading This Thread,Have A Great Day.
https://t.co/hSjEVPNatx
Maadhamaa @GiliLankanfushi GM hayyaru koh dhinumah edhi resort kurimathee muzaaharaa kuraane vaahaka dhannavan! Aadhevunu meehanu annaathi.@Mausoom_Maus @PoliceMv
— Ahmed Aznil (@AhmedAznil) January 23, 2021
More from Society
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?