More from JayneshKasliwal
Detailed Study of Stocks that became 5X in past 2 Years
A Mega Thread🧵
Concepts :
Relative Strength
Stage Analysis
Retweet and Comment If you want a PDF
We have Got around 86 Stocks that became 5X in 2 years
These Belonged to various sectors and Groups
Excel Link for List of Stocks
https://t.co/jESOUMlbpd
( As on 30th March 2022)
[1/n]
All stocks had few things in common :
Stocks doubled Before entering into Stage 2 Uptrend
52 week RS was positive in stage 2
90% stocks even gave all time high breakout after Stage 2
60 Stocks had market cap less than 1000 Cr
Examples : OLECTRA , PGEL
[2/n]
So What is Relative Strength ?
Relative strength is a strategy used in momentum investing and in identifying value stocks.
It focuses on investing in stocks or other investments that have performed well relative to the market as a whole or to a relevant benchmark.
[3/n]
How to Apply ?
Type
“Relative Strength”
Choose any
By bharattrader
By traderlion
By Modhelius
I use by bharattrader
In setting use 52 period
Use Weekly Chart
4/n
A Mega Thread🧵
Concepts :
Relative Strength
Stage Analysis
Retweet and Comment If you want a PDF
We have Got around 86 Stocks that became 5X in 2 years
These Belonged to various sectors and Groups
Excel Link for List of Stocks
https://t.co/jESOUMlbpd
( As on 30th March 2022)
[1/n]
All stocks had few things in common :
Stocks doubled Before entering into Stage 2 Uptrend
52 week RS was positive in stage 2
90% stocks even gave all time high breakout after Stage 2
60 Stocks had market cap less than 1000 Cr
Examples : OLECTRA , PGEL
[2/n]
So What is Relative Strength ?
Relative strength is a strategy used in momentum investing and in identifying value stocks.
It focuses on investing in stocks or other investments that have performed well relative to the market as a whole or to a relevant benchmark.
[3/n]
How to Apply ?
Type
“Relative Strength”
Choose any
By bharattrader
By traderlion
By Modhelius
I use by bharattrader
In setting use 52 period
Use Weekly Chart
4/n
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/
A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowarshttps://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/
A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.