That’s collateral.
You want to buy a house.
You take a loan from the bank.
The bank asks you, “what if you don’t pay back?”
You say, “take my home and sell it”.
(Thread)
That’s collateral.
So a loan where the bank has collateral is considered safer for the bank.
The economy had just recovered from the tech bubble in 2000 where many banks had given out loans to businesses that had shut down.
They did so.
Banks made good money by selling these loans. There was a demand for it.
So they started giving out even more loans to supply the high demand.
Banks give out money to borrowers to buy a house.
Then, banks sell this mortgage to institutional investors.
So they again have money.
This money they lend out again.
Again, they sell this new mortgage to institutional investors.
And so does the price of houses.
But towards the end of 2007, many people start defaulting on their loans.
No big deal.
They start putting these houses up for sale.
More people default on their loans.
More houses come on sale.
Supply and demand kick in.
There are so many houses on sale and not enough buyers.
So house prices start falling.
More borrowers start defaulting on their loans. More houses come on sale. Houses continue to become so cheap, borrowers cannot recover their money.
Banks run out of money to lend.
With some industries slowing down, the economic cycle starts getting affected.
With that, comes job losses.
With job losses, comes reduced spending.
With reduced spending, comes a slowdown.
Right after the 2000 tech bubble, investors and the entire economic system was determined to avoid another tech bubble.
The US being such a major economy, this recession affected the entire globe.
The impact of such massive events is that people’s focus is on making sure the same doesn’t repeat.
That continued right from 2012 to 2020.
In 2020, the markets fell just as sharply.
It was caused by a pandemic - a threat nobody quite expected or saw coming.
The lesson for the investor is the same be it the tech bubble of 2000, the Great Recession of 2008, or the pandemic of 2020.
More from All
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.