This is one of the sell signals I follow. It should give you some idea.
Since market cap of IRCTC is good, I reduced the move rule from 40% to 30% in this case. https://t.co/qzL5rgmtg8
Just a small doubt . I sold Yesterday thinking it was a climax 6% move . How did you decide to sell today ?
— Volatility and Volume Trader (@VolVolatTrader) September 7, 2021
Any rules where you sell positions . Just to learn
More from Ravi Sharma
Read everything written on Wyckoff, Livermore and written by Wyckoff, Livermore.
You would find the roots of all patterns, especially the trend/momentum following ones in their methods.
Once you get the dynamics of Price/Volume, any good book on chart patterns will do.
You would find the roots of all patterns, especially the trend/momentum following ones in their methods.
Once you get the dynamics of Price/Volume, any good book on chart patterns will do.
Any book in which we can read such patterns and the knowledge you have?
— Krish (@MasculinityMon1) August 13, 2021
Reason and pre-analysis for #BAJAJFINSV before buy-
While buying breakouts, your odds will improve a lot when you prefer the following:
1. Strong Relative Strength.
2. Tight price range on low Volume and a pattern which is easy on eyes. https://t.co/CprKpAfgtj
While buying breakouts, your odds will improve a lot when you prefer the following:
1. Strong Relative Strength.
2. Tight price range on low Volume and a pattern which is easy on eyes. https://t.co/CprKpAfgtj
#BAJAJFINSV
— Ravi Sharma (@StocksNerd) August 14, 2021
Setting up in a tight base. Volume has been drying up.
Waiting for the breakout. pic.twitter.com/KWoGZAwkLO
These are long term Moving Averages, which in my view are irrelevant for short term positional trades.
For my trading strategy, 13-day & 22-day EMAs are more suitable.
If SmallCap dips below these MAs & they get into the bearish sync, I get cautious & reduce my position size.
For my trading strategy, 13-day & 22-day EMAs are more suitable.
If SmallCap dips below these MAs & they get into the bearish sync, I get cautious & reduce my position size.
Sir as you follow the smallcap index,do you take full positions when it\u2019s trading below its key moving averages or wait for some confirmation? pic.twitter.com/ph6HTJ9rbD
— Dhanesh Gianani (@dhanesh500) November 30, 2021
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]