- If any Index closed exactly at the resistance, you can get a trade on either side on the next day. (2/11)
How you can filter stocks for Intraday trades - 🧵
As a kid, we would do homework before school the next day - you have to do homework here too. A specific sector performs on a particular day and studying things a day before will help you spot that particular sector. (1/11)
- If any Index closed exactly at the resistance, you can get a trade on either side on the next day. (2/11)
- If any Index closed exactly at support, you can get a trade on either side the following day.
- If there was a bullish signal at the support.
- If any Index gave a breakout or breakdown and then gave a good closing. (3/11)
Once you spot the Index, look at all the stocks in that particular Index. Pick at least 3-4 stocks from that Index and add them to your watchlist for the next day. It's ideal to check both higher and lower timeframes. (4/11)
- Start with checking the top gainers/losers list. I observe market from 9:15 to 9:45am to check the sectors performing well on that day.(5/11)
More from Sheetal Rijhwani
If you're a swing/positional/trend follower, then this thread is for you. In this one, I will be covering how to filter stocks, how to take entry and the exit plans. 🧵 (1/21)
It's practically impossible to check all charts. However, you can use multiple scanners as per your setups to make things easy.
In trending market, even junk stocks give a good move. But in sideways and falling markets, you have to be very selective. (2/21)
One imp. filter for me is trading in strong fundamental stocks. Every quarter, I check results of companies and filter the list. I keep checking the charts and set an alert on the levels. Many good handles on Twitter post good results lists, you can save that as well. (3/21)
This time, I did the same on my telegram channel.
https://t.co/C3eS9PSncG
Second filter for me is Current Performing Sectors/Themes. Keep your eyes and ears open. Being a good observer helps you big time. Make good use of news in your analysis. (4/21)
For Eg: Textiles are performing well for a while now. It has strong consumer interest due to many global retailers, diversifying their outsourcing and reducing their dependence on China. Order booking from India has increased rapidly. (5/21)
It's practically impossible to check all charts. However, you can use multiple scanners as per your setups to make things easy.
In trending market, even junk stocks give a good move. But in sideways and falling markets, you have to be very selective. (2/21)
One imp. filter for me is trading in strong fundamental stocks. Every quarter, I check results of companies and filter the list. I keep checking the charts and set an alert on the levels. Many good handles on Twitter post good results lists, you can save that as well. (3/21)
This time, I did the same on my telegram channel.
https://t.co/C3eS9PSncG
Second filter for me is Current Performing Sectors/Themes. Keep your eyes and ears open. Being a good observer helps you big time. Make good use of news in your analysis. (4/21)
For Eg: Textiles are performing well for a while now. It has strong consumer interest due to many global retailers, diversifying their outsourcing and reducing their dependence on China. Order booking from India has increased rapidly. (5/21)
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
