I had written this thread in refutation to your false claims which you had made from your previous account and you had even quoted it from your old account and now you are lying that you didn't know about this thread?
Are you trying to say the Verse of Quran i had mentioned

in the thread is false? If that's your claim then say it clearly that all the verses of Quran and hadiths are false which talks about equality and your propaganda is the ultimate truth and hidden secret of Islam.
a) If you are trying to say that just being born in a Quraysh tribe
makes one superior than others then let me remind you that the first oppressors of the Prophet pbuh were Quraysh, the first battle of Muslims happened with Quraysh, the guy who was cursed by Allah in Quran was a Quraysh (ever read Quran?). And if you want to show that being from
the lineage of Prophets makes you superior than others then let me remind you that the son of Prophet Adam will be in hell (as informed to us by the narrations), the son of Prophet Noah will be in hell, the wife of Prophet Noah will be in hell, the wife of Prophet Lut will be in
hell. And if you are trying to say that only Quraysh had the right to rule and not others then let me remind you from history that the Messenger of Allah pbuh appointed leaders Abdullah bin Ruwaha, Zaid bin Haritha, and Usama bin Zaid, and all of them were not from Quraish.
Thus the Messenger gave leadership to people other than Quraish. So the hadith quoted by you indicates that it is a informative, not imperative and not an obligation; thus it is a condition of preference not a contracting condition per se. Even Hindus who have little knowledge
about Islam can understand the difference of tone in the sayings and can guess whether its an order or not and they also understand that you cant present Hadith in opposition to Quran. And, I will show you how the order and recommendation looks like in the following tweets.
The word “this matter” means the authority i.e. the rule and it is not restricted in the Khilafah alone. We can conclude therefore that since the Messenger pbuh appointed other than Quraish in the ruling then this is an evidence that ruling is not restricted to them and not
prevented from people other than them. Explaining this point, Sh Al Nabhani gives the below examples:

“Zaid is standing up” does not denote the banishment of the standing up of other than Zaid, and the example “there is Zakaat on the sheep” does not denote the banishment of the
Zakaat in other than the sheep.

In the above examples, “Zayd” is a proper noun and “sheep” is a generic noun. Therefore, as agreed upon by all scholars, mafhum al-mukhalafah cannot be taken from these nouns, which means that we may not conclude from the above sentences that no
one else apart from Zayd is standing, nor that no other animals apart from sheep have zakat due on them.
And this is how an order looks and sounds like.
b) How dishonest of you to bring the comb photo which suits your agenda? Do you know what the Comb of Prophet made of and how it used to look? & why he choose the comb also as the example to explain the equality among many of his attempts (ways) in which he propagated the message
of equality? we get the information about two combs which our Prophet had used. One was made of iron called as Midrah and another was made of ivory also called as adh-Dhabl.
Bone comb from the Carolingian period (750-900) in the archeological museum of Hamme, Belgium.
Bone comb with two heads of horses from the Carolingian period (750-900) found in the river Scheldt, now in the archeological museum of Hamme, Belgium.
A 14th-century ivory comb.
And Prophet's comb has equal teeth and people around him used the similar combs, that's the reason he
had explained the people in this way (also) but this is not the only one example or way he had given the message of equality in many ways and in many instances of his life. And the greatest message of message of equality is his last sermon in which He pbuh said, "O People, listen
well to my words, for I do not know whether, after this year, I shall ever be amongst you again. Therefore listen to what I am saying to you very carefully and take these words to those who could not be present here today…. All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has
no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action…”

More from Religion

"Hinduism was one of the world's most easy-going faith traditions, famed for it's non-persecutory history."

I can assure you, it is NOT.

It is neither easy-going, nor non-persecutory. In fact it is the very opposite.

Thread.


Modern Hinduism is a British colonial concept, created in concert with Brahmins, who are at the "apex" of the caste system. The word "Hindoo" in fact, is of Persian origin, meaning a person who lives in the Indus valley.

Colonialists who attempted to study Indian religion in the 18th century (NOT, at the time, Hinduism) were baffled by it. Strata of people living distinctly (the caste system) with overlapping gods didn't fit into their Judeo-Christian understanding of religion.

Which has an ecclesiastical authority, a holy book etc., which Indian religions lacked. In studying "The Hindoo", colonialists prioritized textual sources of knowledge, which is where Brahmins, the priestly caste with a monopoly over education/text come in.

Brahminism was a distinct "religion" (although i don't really want to use the term in this way) that was frankly terrorized of other castes. In fact, the very basis of Brahminism is oppression. Brahmins had scholars who recorded *Brahminical* canon textually.

You May Also Like