2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Thank you for reading this thread.

If you enjoyed it, please retweet the first tweet and follow me @TheWiseSage_

My goal is to help you become your best self.
Want to build a Twitter business that makes you $100/day?

Get "Twitter Launch Pad"

This book will teach you how to:

- Get your first 10k followers
- Go viral every single day
- Network to build your influence

Grab it here:
https://t.co/PLrSRddmQI
Book credit: The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene

More from Principles

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x