Categories Politics

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
I do not ā€œgrasp at strawsā€, @LarrySchweikart and you are not the only person with an education.šŸ‘Øā€šŸŽ“

-First, re the Electoral Slates for Trump: they are currently *uncertified*. We hope to get them retroactively certified.


-I sincerely hope you are helping us do this by organizing your followers to make phone calls to their Legislators, instead of complaining about the process. No time for that.

-Secondly, I will address, once again, the historic role of the @VP vis-Ć -vis 12A & ECA of 1887.

-Because of the ambiguity of 12A, its passive voice phrasing, I posit the ā€œPresident of the Senateā€ has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which ā€œcertificatesā€ to ā€œopenā€ and thus which electoral votes ā€œto be countedā€ in the event competing slates arrive.

-Now, you are coming from the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which is a convoluted mess.

-You inferred the Trump electors are "illegitimateā€.

-Well, the Act says only the votes ā€œappointed in accordance with the laws of the Stateā€ may be "counted".

OBJECTION! LOL!šŸ˜

-Trump loyal Rs shall argue the ā€œexecutive certifiedā€ slates are illegitimate because of election irregularities from the contested states.

-But what if the Trump slates are not certified by 1/6? Then both will be thrown out.
Such a clear example of the conflicts embedded deep into our systems. In this case voting system.
What is lost in this maelstrom of Trump(ism) and its nonsense, so well called out by @GabrielSterling, is the underlying fact that partisans are in control of what should be a


non partisan function.

As welcome is the pushback the office of the Sec State of GA is, it is only barely sufficient. And when coupled with the equally sever problem of voter suppression, including purging the rolls, shutting down voting locations, all aimed at minority

populations, making it unnecessarily difficult, sometimes impossible, for these citizens to register their vote...When the larger issue is taken into account it is clear that we, and GA, are still reeling from ancient social problems.

As good as @GabrielSterling has been re this extreme Trump lying and BS...it is only because Trump is so very far out of sync with reality and facts that he falls outside even the very generous boundaries of what voter suppression is officially sanctioned. That itself is amazing

So, appreciate that, thankfully, there actually is a line that some people, even in their partisan positions of power, will not cross.
And then recognize that in this tweet is embodied the substrate of the problem....

A non partisan function is being administered in a partisan
Texas is disputing US election results in 4 swing states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin & Georgia

Under Article III, US Supreme Court settles disputes between 2 or more states

Due to safe harbour, Trump’s remaining legal routes are narrow after

Brief analysis:
The Texas case is about the contested swing states’ executive & judicial branches VS their legislatures, on mail-in ballot rules

On Tuesday before safe harbour, SCOTUS rejected a similar lawsuit brought by Republican Rep. Mike Kelly

But a 3rd & eerily similar case has been with Justice Alito (as circuit judge for PA) & the Supreme Court since before the election. It’s about this very same executive & judiciary VS legislature dispute. That case, PA Republican Party vs Boockvar, may be decided in time, or not


The below is also worth noting:


There is also the issue of ā€˜safe harbour’ being said to only be ā€œproceduralā€. This view rests on a reading of the Bush v Gore Supreme Court ruling.