Categories Politics
China’s Elite Capture:
- Over 600 Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members at 19 branches of HSBC & Standard Chartered
- 123 CCP at Pfizer & AstraZeneca (coronavirus vaccines)
- Defence firms Airbus, Boeing & Rolls-Royce employed hundreds of
“In the nine months to September, 14 Chinese nationals were charged over alleged spying offences and the Trump administration last week changed its visa rules so members of the Chinese Communist Party and their families can stay or get travel documents for only a month.”
“Last week, John Ratcliffe, the US Director of National Security, warned that China posed the 'greatest threat to democracy and freedom' since the Second World War and was striving to dominate 'the planet economically, militarily and technologically'.”
it’s been 6 months since my 5 day hunger strike to highlight history’s most technologically sophisticated genocide in china (https://t.co/Vu8BVi2w4q)
yet still there’s not been a single mainstream UK newspaper frontpage on the Uyghur plight
never stop asking WHY?
Self-evident.
By @MichaelPSenger for @tabletmag
Have you ever seen anything like this?
The WORLD is watching. Thank you Japan! \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \U0001f1ef\U0001f1f5 pic.twitter.com/91WF9SXSAT
— anonymous patriot \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@anonpatriotq) December 27, 2020
South Korea Trump rally
THE WORLD IS WATCHING
Have you ever seen anything like
Canada Trump rally
THE WORLD IS WATCHING
Have you ever seen anything like this?
UK Trump rally
THE WORLD IS WATCHING
Have you ever seen anything like this?
A Trump Rally...in the
Taiwan Trump rally
THE WORLD IS WATCHING
Have you ever seen anything like
Still, he's taken a very big step back now. The cliff risk was today; both sides were so close to the edge they could easily have gone over it. The fact @10DowningStreet didn't means Govt must genuinely believe there's now a landing zone that works, & which it can sell ENDS
— Mujtaba Rahman (@Mij_Europe) December 13, 2020
I find it most amusing that people invest so much value in public statements, briefings, tabloid headlines, the tweets of obscure backbenchers etc. Cherchez les fundamentals!
There is a deep vein of analytical pessimism in one particular direction, which, whether correct or not, is noteworthy. On the one hand, a firm belief in the fundamentals - gravity exists - but on the other hand those fundamentals are not meaningful to the final decision.
But gravity does exist! Whether one likes it or not. We do not have wings. Or feathers. And the realisation of the fundamentals will impact the political calculation (though timing differences may apply).
You don’t have to invest any particular optimism or see any virtue in the principal players to make this point.
-First, re the Electoral Slates for Trump: they are currently *uncertified*. We hope to get them retroactively certified.
authority to "throw out" an electoral slate and accept another.
— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) December 17, 2020
I know our side is depressed & grasping at straws, but this ain't it.
-I sincerely hope you are helping us do this by organizing your followers to make phone calls to their Legislators, instead of complaining about the process. No time for that.
-Secondly, I will address, once again, the historic role of the @VP vis-à-vis 12A & ECA of 1887.
-Because of the ambiguity of 12A, its passive voice phrasing, I posit the “President of the Senate” has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which “certificates” to “open” and thus which electoral votes “to be counted” in the event competing slates arrive.
-Now, you are coming from the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which is a convoluted mess.
-You inferred the Trump electors are "illegitimate”.
-Well, the Act says only the votes “appointed in accordance with the laws of the State” may be "counted".
OBJECTION! LOL!😝
-Trump loyal Rs shall argue the “executive certified” slates are illegitimate because of election irregularities from the contested states.
-But what if the Trump slates are not certified by 1/6? Then both will be thrown out.
To explain: since March, the government has used the Public Health (Control of Diseases) Act 1984 to pass lockdown laws - over 60 (I have listed them here https://t.co/5Z1p3gVjbX).
The lockdown laws have imposed stringent restrictions on movement, freedom of association, family life, religion etc. But each and every lockdown law passed has used the super emergency procedure which allows the government to pass them without a parliamentary vote for 28 days
The government did this for months before MPs revolted at which point it promised to put any major changes before parliament first. It has done this since the three tiers in mid-October.
BUT...
(1) The govt is still only giving parliament about 12 hours to consider laws and the vote is a simple yes or no
(2) Changes to tiered areas are not considered major changes so these don't go to a vote until 28 days later by which time it has usually changed.
11/02/2017 Q 49
Follow Sen Grassley.
What is different effective this week?
What do you notice?
Why does Sen Grassley (one example) have a higher than normal amount of security detail?
https://t.co/IYvdXIwM6V
11/06/2017 Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley seeks more info about James Comey's decision not to charge Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of State.https://t.co/3mMWctuIqA
— CodesUcq (@CodesUcq) January 16, 2021
Comments on @OptimisticCon's Article - Part 2
We'll pick up with Slide 6 shortly, but we have a couple of stops on the way to make first. Here we go!
29 December 2020 #MAGAanalysis #Overturn
— Pasquale "Pat" Scopelliti (@ThyConsigliori) December 29, 2020
Comments On @OptimisticCon Article:
The key supporting effort appears to be underway on Trump\u2019s operational timeline
As we emphasized yesterday, J.E. Dyer commands us: "But do hold the line." https://t.co/L7Bu7KzVeM
I hear this almost daily from my friends in SF.
Each time I'm increasingly concerned about the myopic view of the left (& media outlets...)
This summer I started following many Republicans on Twitter. A 🧵... (1/x)
My election emotions:
— Amanda Goetz (@AmandaMGoetz) November 5, 2020
First disbelief
Then anger
Now curiosity
I\u2019m curious what Trump appeals to for 60m+ Americans.
What is broken in our system?
What is missing for a very large group of ppl?
How can a large # of women support his views?
Get curious to make change.