Categories Politics
What does Dominion mean !!
Dominion = Global Domination = Election rigging war instead of the traditional war with guns and fire,
100 years ago
The Balfour Declaration of 1926 recognized dominions
Founded by Rothschild and offered to Balfour in exchange for Palestine
Dominion = Global Domination
Note the symbolism of the š
The Balfour Declaration of 1926 recognised Dominions (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, South Africa, Irish Free State. India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Kenya) as autonomous communities within British Empire
— re5iGaM (@re5iGam) December 6, 2020
Dominion = World Dominance
Notice crown symbolism pic.twitter.com/rdFPx8m2Iw
In 1917 Rothschild offered Balfour
The Domainbon regime, the World Bank, and plans to manufacture military weapons as part of a set of promotional offers to allow them to seize the land of Palestine,
In 1926, he publicly admitted Balfour
"Dominions System in Elections rigging"
In 1926, he publicly admitted Balfour
"Dominions system for rigging elections"
The most important of them is ..
(Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, South Africa, the Ireland Free State, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, and Kenya)
as independent communities within the British Empire
Dominion = Global Domination = COVID-19 Vaccine
h/t @BenjaminPD23
Search RATS in the drops. Several hits. Hereās one:
Phase III
Traitors Justice.
Whatās PHASE III?
one of 8 moon phases each month. Phase III for Dec 2020 appears to be Dec 21, winter solstice.
Phase III shows Dark to Light. Look at it! Half Dark half Light looking straight on.
for Dec 2020 it also falls on Winter Solstice 12/21. Another Dark to Light Day. Shortest day of the Year with least amount of daylight.
https://t.co/F8hYtfr8Al
2/ 12/21 winter solstice is a DARK to LIGHT day. The shortest day of the year, when days start getting longer, with more minutes of sunlight. Also? In 2020 that day we will see a CHRISTMAS \u2b50\ufe0f , first time in 800 years! https://t.co/kcTV6dgs9d
— #ReleaseTheKRAKEN BrunoBarking (@Bruno062418) December 13, 2020
I started by simply stating that I thought that the arguments that I had heard so far don't hold up, and seeing if anyone was interested in going into it in depth with
CritRats!
— Eli Tyre (@EpistemicHope) December 26, 2020
I think AI risk is a real existential concern, and I claim that the CritRat counterarguments that I've heard so far (keywords: universality, person, moral knowledge, education, etc.) don't hold up.
Anyone want to hash this out with me?https://t.co/Sdm4SSfQZv
So far, a few people have engaged pretty extensively with me, for instance, scheduling video calls to talk about some of the stuff, or long private chats.
(Links to some of those that are public at the bottom of the thread.)
But in addition to that, there has been a much more sprawling conversation happening on twitter, involving a much larger number of people.
Having talked to a number of people, I then offered a paraphrase of the basic counter that I was hearing from people of the Crit Rat persuasion.
ELI'S PARAPHRASE OF THE CRIT RAT STORY ABOUT AGI AND AI RISK
— Eli Tyre (@EpistemicHope) January 5, 2021
There are two things that you might call "AI".
The first is non-general AI, which is a program that follows some pre-set algorithm to solve a pre-set problem. This includes modern ML.
So a high Impact Factor journal is widely considered reputable by the general scientific/research/medical community. So when a high Impact Factor journal comes out with a statement, it should be taken seriously. 2/x
Consider this article āTrump lied about scienceā from @ScienceMagazine (IF 41.85) https://t.co/6ApeVqxgWO 3/x
Consider this article āWhy Nature supports Joe Biden for US Presidentā from @Nature (IF 42.778) https://t.co/2AJx5A3zUU 4/x
Consider this article āTrump versus Biden: a fight for the health of a nationā from @TheLancet (IF 60.392) https://t.co/tfbZ1LAnM2 5/x
I've seen a number of attempts today to convince Democratic voters they don't have to vote, because Biden has it in the bag, and/or Trump is about to resign.
— DCPetterson (@dcpetterson) October 10, 2020
Don't buy it. If your vote didn't matter, Fascists wouldn't be trying to tell you that you don't have to vote.
Here in Colorado, I am fairly certain that Hickenlooper and Biden will win.
But Iām less sure that @BriannaForCO, my amazing house rep, will prevail. I donāt know about the income tax measures on the ballot that would gut state funding in the middle of a massive budget crisis.
Thereās an abortion ban on the ballot. Iām not taking chances with that.
And, you know, it felt GOOD to vote against Trump and Gardner. My vote did more good than the many, many phone messages I left for Gardnerās office, which I suspect were just tossed in the bin.
Vote because the DA and the sheriff will directly impact the lives of minorities in your community. Vote because your county coroner could determine whether your trans loved ones are treated with dignity at death.
2/ Last night @rtenews reported that if a free trade deal were to be concluded, a sequence would be put in place at the end of which the UK would drop the clauses in the Internal Market Bill which breach the Protocol.
3/ This morning, the EUās representative on the Joint Committee, which implements the Protocol, said he would be meeting his counterpart Michael Gove in Brussels today.
\U0001f1ea\U0001f1fa\U0001f1ec\U0001f1e7 I will meet @michaelgove today in Brussels to discuss the implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement, including the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland. We are working hard to make sure it is fully operational as of 1 January 2021.
— Maro\u0161 \u0160ef\u010dovi\u010d\U0001f1ea\U0001f1fa (@MarosSefcovic) December 7, 2020
4/ Mr Coveney said: āThere is more cause to be optimistic and positive in the context of the Joint Committee and its work in terms of implementing the Withdrawal Agreement and the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland.
5/ āMaros Sefcovic and Michael Gove have made really practical progress on many of the outstanding issues that were not resolved up until a few weeks ago.
Under Article III, US Supreme Court settles disputes between 2 or more states
Due to safe harbour, Trumpās remaining legal routes are narrow after
Brief analysis:
The Texas case is about the contested swing statesā executive & judicial branches VS their legislatures, on mail-in ballot rules
On Tuesday before safe harbour, SCOTUS rejected a similar lawsuit brought by Republican Rep. Mike Kelly
But a 3rd & eerily similar case has been with Justice Alito (as circuit judge for PA) & the Supreme Court since before the election. Itās about this very same executive & judiciary VS legislature dispute. That case, PA Republican Party vs Boockvar, may be decided in time, or not
A pending Supreme Court judgement in the case of Boockvar decides Pennsylvania
— Maajid \u0623\u0628\u0648 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0627\u0631 (@MaajidNawaz) November 11, 2020
That was not a fraud case. The number of votes is secondary
It is about auditing a temporary mail ballot ringfence, imposed till a constitutional case against alleged judicial activism in PA is heard https://t.co/ek8gkDibKZ
The below is also worth noting:
It is important for election heads following this story to note that in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Georgia the electoral college is *not legally obliged* to vote as their state did. If disputes about election integrity continue, what these electors think, will matter
— Maajid \u0623\u0628\u0648 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0627\u0631 (@MaajidNawaz) November 13, 2020
There is also the issue of āsafe harbourā being said to only be āproceduralā. This view rests on a reading of the Bush v Gore Supreme Court ruling.