Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitah
Your Small Help, Can make a Huge Difference 🙏🙏🙏
So please Share, Like, Retweet This
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
All Hindus out there a Small Help🙏🙏🙏
All of you know about @ikamalhaasan
He is a politician now in TN
He has been speaking ill about Hinduism throughout his life, because his family members are trying to convert Hindus into Christians 😡
1)So please download these videos 🙏
Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitah
Your Small Help, Can make a Huge Difference 🙏🙏🙏
So please Share, Like, Retweet This
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Comparing religious activities to Sex!!!
Degrading Ganesh Chaturthi/Vinayagar Chaturthi !!!!
Anuhassan- Daughter of Chandrahassan
Chandrahassan- Elder brother of Kamalhassan
😡😡😡😡😡
"Was always British/Christian in Heart "
"Loved the British Culture "
Then can love any culture but how dare
they insulted/degraded our Indian Culture 😡
Involved in Christian Conversion
Their Main Targets Are Brahmins
In this video, you can see how he converts a Brahmin Family by quoting our Vedas Wrongly
Charuhassan-"Only Jesus is True God, Only he can give Salvation "
More from Politics
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
