🚨 Thread: Color (Colour) Revolution:

1. The definition shown in the pics. It’s not really about color, but is all about division. In case you didn’t know, it began in America when Donald Trump was elected in 2016.

2. The goal of a color revolution is regime change. Our C_A 🤡 has used it effectively in many foreign countries. In the US, their goal is also to destroy our Constitution, as well as our status as a military & economic super power in the world.
3. Who is funding the color revolution in our Nation? It’s more than Soros. It’s funded by our own corporations (the ones getting rich while small businesses suffer), MSM, Big Tech, etc. There’s also $ from China, Iran, Russia, etc.
4. If you’ve been paying attention, similar actions have been taking place In Europe & other countries. Link to 12 min video & written explanation:
https://t.co/EhM8V0sOeF
5. This is further facilitated by radicalization & propaganda in our public schools & universities. Ironically, it’s the same method used to groom terrorists including suicide bombers. From 2009: https://t.co/cSjwoHUK4H
6. Our enemies want us to devolve into civil war. This would cost countless lives, destroy our economy & collapse our Constitutional Republic. All while the globalists sit comfortably in secure, undisclosed locations.
7. In Special Forces, we’re trained in unconventional warfare, COIN (counter-insurgency), etc. This article is from a former SF operator:
https://t.co/NiO321cYn9
8. It may be helpful to understand the components of our color revolution. As you look back on the last 4 years, or even just 2020, the evidence of what has taken place adds to the various components shown in the attached:
9. What may be scary is the historical success achieved by color revolutions. Each one has been successful, so far. It’s up to US as a Nation to reject the attempts to divide us, destroy our Constitution (rights), rewrite our history, remove our statues & impose tyranny.
10. What makes it possible for Us to win where others failed? We are a Nation under God. The blood of our Patriot forefathers runs thru our veins. The number of Us willing to give all for our Nation far exceeds our enemy. Must watch đź‘€
https://t.co/ggnmn0J7oX
11. To those who want to enslave us, we firmly swear, “We will die on our feet, before we live on our knees.” Our spirit & will is indomitable.
https://t.co/lq1XtwpWGS
12. As @LLinWood has said, this is our 1776. They tried to subvert our electoral process by stealing an election. Will you allow the enemy to succeed or will you Fight and Resist their attempts to control you? đź‘€
https://t.co/GyErWoqCIq
13. Many of the blue cities & states where we see the most problems, are led by compromised, corrupt individuals who support the color revolution. They have done nothing to support the Constitution or uphold the law.
14. Many other elected, establishment politicians, on both sides, are part of the problem. They’ve sold out our country to enrich themselves. We’ve all seen them identify themselves & the lines have been drawn.
15. Our President continues to fight for us, but he needs our help. Do everything within your power to make yourself heard. Focus on the fights that matter most. This is not the time to sit back, but to stand up for your constitutional rights.
16. How do we ID the command & control of the enemy? How do we cut off the funding of the color revolution? The answer is the U.S. military. Seize the assets of criminals & unleash the Insurrection Act. Along with our support, it’s the only way to defeat the invisible enemy. End

More from Politics

This idea - that elections should translate into policy - is not wrong at all. But political science can help explain why it's not working this way. There are three main explanations: 1. mandates are constructed, not automatic, 2. party asymmetry, 3. partisan conpetition 1/


First, party/policy mandates from elections are far from self-executing in our system. Work on mandates from Dahl to Ellis and Kirk on the history of the mandate to mine on its role in post-Nixon politics, to Peterson Grossback and Stimson all emphasize that this link is... 2/

Created deliberately and isn't always persuasive. Others have to convinced that the election meant a particular thing for it to work in a legislative context. I theorized in the immediate period of after the 2020 election that this was part of why Repubs signed on to ...3/

Trump's demonstrably false fraud nonsense - it derailed an emerging mandate news cycle. Winners of elections get what they get - institutional control - but can't expect much beyond that unless the perception of an election mandate takes hold. And it didn't. 4/

Let's turn to the legislation element of this. There's just an asymmetry in terms of passing a relief bill. Republicans are presumably less motivated to get some kind of deal passed. Democrats are more likely to want to do *something.* 5/

You May Also Like

"I really want to break into Product Management"

make products.

"If only someone would tell me how I can get a startup to notice me."

Make Products.

"I guess it's impossible and I'll never break into the industry."

MAKE PRODUCTS.

Courtesy of @edbrisson's wonderful thread on breaking into comics –
https://t.co/TgNblNSCBj – here is why the same applies to Product Management, too.


There is no better way of learning the craft of product, or proving your potential to employers, than just doing it.

You do not need anybody's permission. We don't have diplomas, nor doctorates. We can barely agree on a single standard of what a Product Manager is supposed to do.

But – there is at least one blindingly obvious industry consensus – a Product Manager makes Products.

And they don't need to be kept at the exact right temperature, given endless resource, or carefully protected in order to do this.

They find their own way.