🚨 Thread: Color (Colour) Revolution:

1. The definition shown in the pics. It’s not really about color, but is all about division. In case you didn’t know, it began in America when Donald Trump was elected in 2016.

2. The goal of a color revolution is regime change. Our C_A 🤡 has used it effectively in many foreign countries. In the US, their goal is also to destroy our Constitution, as well as our status as a military & economic super power in the world.
3. Who is funding the color revolution in our Nation? It’s more than Soros. It’s funded by our own corporations (the ones getting rich while small businesses suffer), MSM, Big Tech, etc. There’s also $ from China, Iran, Russia, etc.
4. If you’ve been paying attention, similar actions have been taking place In Europe & other countries. Link to 12 min video & written explanation:
https://t.co/EhM8V0sOeF
5. This is further facilitated by radicalization & propaganda in our public schools & universities. Ironically, it’s the same method used to groom terrorists including suicide bombers. From 2009: https://t.co/cSjwoHUK4H
6. Our enemies want us to devolve into civil war. This would cost countless lives, destroy our economy & collapse our Constitutional Republic. All while the globalists sit comfortably in secure, undisclosed locations.
7. In Special Forces, we’re trained in unconventional warfare, COIN (counter-insurgency), etc. This article is from a former SF operator:
https://t.co/NiO321cYn9
8. It may be helpful to understand the components of our color revolution. As you look back on the last 4 years, or even just 2020, the evidence of what has taken place adds to the various components shown in the attached:
9. What may be scary is the historical success achieved by color revolutions. Each one has been successful, so far. It’s up to US as a Nation to reject the attempts to divide us, destroy our Constitution (rights), rewrite our history, remove our statues & impose tyranny.
10. What makes it possible for Us to win where others failed? We are a Nation under God. The blood of our Patriot forefathers runs thru our veins. The number of Us willing to give all for our Nation far exceeds our enemy. Must watch 👀
https://t.co/ggnmn0J7oX
11. To those who want to enslave us, we firmly swear, “We will die on our feet, before we live on our knees.” Our spirit & will is indomitable.
https://t.co/lq1XtwpWGS
12. As @LLinWood has said, this is our 1776. They tried to subvert our electoral process by stealing an election. Will you allow the enemy to succeed or will you Fight and Resist their attempts to control you? 👀
https://t.co/GyErWoqCIq
13. Many of the blue cities & states where we see the most problems, are led by compromised, corrupt individuals who support the color revolution. They have done nothing to support the Constitution or uphold the law.
14. Many other elected, establishment politicians, on both sides, are part of the problem. They’ve sold out our country to enrich themselves. We’ve all seen them identify themselves & the lines have been drawn.
15. Our President continues to fight for us, but he needs our help. Do everything within your power to make yourself heard. Focus on the fights that matter most. This is not the time to sit back, but to stand up for your constitutional rights.
16. How do we ID the command & control of the enemy? How do we cut off the funding of the color revolution? The answer is the U.S. military. Seize the assets of criminals & unleash the Insurrection Act. Along with our support, it’s the only way to defeat the invisible enemy. End

More from Politics

We’ve been getting calls and outreach from Queens residents all day about this.

The community’s response? Outrage.


Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea that it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks at a time when our subway is crumbling and our communities need MORE investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here.

When we talk about bringing jobs to the community, we need to dig deep:
- Has the company promised to hire in the existing community?
- What’s the quality of jobs + how many are promised? Are these jobs low-wage or high wage? Are there benefits? Can people collectively bargain?

Displacement is not community development. Investing in luxury condos is not the same thing as investing in people and families.

Shuffling working class people out of a community does not improve their quality of life.

We need to focus on good healthcare, living wages, affordable rent. Corporations that offer none of those things should be met w/ skepticism.

It’s possible to establish economic partnerships w/ real opportunities for working families, instead of a race-to-the-bottom competition.
Here we go. Tag 4 des Impeachments. Trumps Verteidigung.


Es wird argumentiert, dass Trump nur habe sicherstellen wollen, dass die Wahl fair abgelaufen sei. Die Verteidigung zeigt Clips einzelner Demokraten, die der Zertifizierung von Trumps Stimmen 2016 widersprechen. (Dass es 2016 keinen von Obama gesandten Mob aufs Kapitol gab?Egal!)

Die intellektuelle Unehrlichkeit ist so unfassbar, ich weiß kaum, wo ich hier überhaupt anfangen soll; so viele fucking Strohmänner auf einmal.

Die Verteidigung spielt random Clips, in denen Demokraten “fight” sagen, fast zehn Minuten lang. Weil Trump 20mal am 6. Januar “fight” gesagt hat. Dies ist kein Witz. Komisch, dass sonst die Folge nie war, dass ein Mob das Kapitol gestürmt hat und Pence hängen wollte


“Dieser Fall geht um politischen Hass” Ich mein, ja. “Die House Managers hassen Donald Trump.”

So close.

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x