#15100 strikes OIs Bullish crossover.... https://t.co/IgXLn1P5F3
#15100 strikes OIs are still away, though 15100PE OI has risen sharply since morning but unable to cross above 15100CE OI.. any crossover intraday shall further fuel up the rally....otherwise Nifty may close below or around 15100 cash levels today. #JUSTaVIEW pic.twitter.com/6aQIPEFx3h
— Akaash (@thepnfway) May 21, 2021
More from Akaash
#CDSL another holding from lower levels...now looks ready for further northward journey.... #TechnoFundaPick #ADB pic.twitter.com/A3cjRV94Ew
— Akaash (@thepnfway) February 19, 2021
#BlueDart sold all yesterday with 50%+ ROI & converted it in to #TCIEXP .....Rationale-: Below #Ratio #TCI / #BLUEDART is self explanatory\U0001f447 https://t.co/PNl9PWOB8V pic.twitter.com/ZTX86nLoDJ
— Akaash (@thepnfway) July 20, 2021
More from Optionslearnings
One of those strategies which I like is Iron Fly✈️
Few important points on Iron fly stategy
This is fixed loss🔴 defined stategy ,so you are aware of your losses . You know your risk ⚠️and breakeven points to exit the positions.
Risk is defined , so at psychological🧠 level you are at peace🙋♀️
How to implement
1. Should be done on Tuesday or Wednesday for next week expiry after 1-2 pm
2. Take view of the market ,looking at daily chart
3. Then do weekly iron fly.
4. No need to hold this till expiry day .
5.Exit it one day before expiry or when you see more than 2% within the week.
5. High vix is preferred for iron fly
6. Can be executed with less capital of 3-5 lakhs .
https://t.co/MYDgWkjYo8 have R:2R so over all it should be good.
8. If you are able to get 6% return monthly ,it means close to 100% return on your capital per annum.
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?