What is not satire are the numerous death threats that were sent to us by Trump supporters in the lead up to the November election.
.@louiscasiano from @FoxNews reached out to ask if we are actually planning on contaminating the hotel rooms of Proud Boys with bedbugs. The short answer is no, we don't even know if that's possible. But here's our full response.
What is not satire are the numerous death threats that were sent to us by Trump supporters in the lead up to the November election.
https://t.co/UiI12M0Aey.
https://t.co/PPe75XWImX
https://t.co/4Ia8659wK8
https://t.co/n5ov6R8Gyh
https://t.co/g2oXEQaCQm
https://t.co/PPe75XWImX
Yup. They have no interest in public safety. Inspector Glover is doing everything he can to support @realDonaldTrump's coup. @MayorBowser get your cops in line. pic.twitter.com/VAAu58v7N5
— ShutDownDC (@ShutDown_DC) November 15, 2020
More from News
What appears to be so newsworthy about this particular leaked list is the presence of CCP branches in not only foreign-invested firms in #China, but also in firms entirely located overseas.
This is by no means new-- I wrote several years ago about #China's massive Party-building drive to construct new CCP branches in Shanghai's NGOs in @chinaquarterly (The Advance of the Party: Transformation or Takeover of Urban Grassroots Society?* https://t.co/I1XKmkPKty )...
As well as the CCP's attempts to "comprehensively cover" 全覆盖 Shanghai's private sector in "The New Life of the Party: Party-Building & Social Engineering in Greater Shanghai" in the #China Journal, but what's apparently of concern in the leaked list..
...is the number of new Communist Party branches & committees now in Chinese-invested companies abroad. This is unsurprisingly going on on a massive scale in countries housing #China's Belt and Road projects as part of the CCP's "going out" 走出去efforts...#OBOR #BRI #一带一路
Gaza strip being bombed ~ 1 hour ago
— Nabeel Yakzan (@MarxistBastard) December 26, 2020
Absolutely 0 media coverage locally or internationally pic.twitter.com/ZLwWcQDwXb
video
\u0647\u0644 \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0647\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0630\u064a \u062a\u062f\u0639\u0648 \u0639\u0644\u064a\u0647 \u0625\u0633\u0631\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0646\u0630 \u0627\u062d\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627 \u0644\u0647\u0630\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0631\u0636\u061f
— \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u064a\u062c\u064a (@mohammed500s) December 26, 2020
\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0635\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0631\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u063a\u0632\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0636\u064a\u0629#\u063a\u0632\u0629#\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639_\u062e\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0629_\u0644\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0633\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629
Is this the peace that Israel claims to have spread since its occupation of this land?
The Israeli bombing of Gaza last night#Gaza#\u063a\u0632\u0629_\u062a\u062d\u062a_\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0635\u0641 pic.twitter.com/8ouV1nuXc7
You May Also Like
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Project: Lifelog
— Robert Horan (@Robby12692) December 13, 2018
Started by DARPA in 1999, the goal of Lifelog was to create a database on civilians without their knowledge, and track everything they do.
The project "ended" on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook began the exact same day.
The CIA funneled tens of millions into Facebook. pic.twitter.com/r7hwF0v9kh
Pentagon Kills LifeLog
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?