How to destroy your competition with Cold Email

Want numbers like this?

I am going to show you exactly how to GUARANTEE your cold emails will convert.

// THREAD //

First, I am going to show you the structure of a killer cold email.

---
{{Quick Question about Company_Name}} <-- Subject line

Hey {{Name}}, [[first line}} <-- individual personalization is key

We just helped ___, a business like yours, do x in y days <-- Case study
I'm 100% certain we can do something similar for you.

Do you have time for a call this week? <-- CTA

--------
Let's break this down.

Our main goal is to not sound automated. (even though it was in a way)

How do we do that?

Highly Personalized First Lines.

We have their:

- Company Name
- First Name
- LinkedIn Profile

I use https://t.co/cotgiyqqLE to scrape this. (not aff)
The better the first line, the better the cold email will convert.

We need 10/10 first lines.

A good offer + a bad first line = 60% open & 8% reply rate

A good offer + a 10/10 first line = 80% open & 20% reply rate

Run the numbers.
There's only one way to do this.

@THETYFRANKEL & @blackhatwizardd just came out with a 13 HOUR series of training videos that will turn a newborn baby into a God-Tier first line writer.

Price is going up to $127 very soon!

Heres the link --> https://t.co/9FGWt12mdH (not aff)
1. Go on Upwork or Onlinejobsph.

2. Post a job titled "first line writer" (they'll know)

3. Hire them for <$1

4. Give them the training videos

5. Watch your cold emails skyrocket
Mastering Outreach:

- Keep the cold email short (no fluff)

- Test EVERYTHING (angles, CTAs, case studies, MB guarantee, etc.)

- Make sure your domain doesn't get blacklisted (g-suite, lemwarm)

- Get Cold Email Mastery (next page)
In 2018, the average cold email reply rate was 1%...

On a terrible day, I get 70% open, 15% reply, 5% meeting book rate

How is this possible?

@blackhatwizardd Cold Email Mastery (almost 400 5 star reviews)

https://t.co/YbZA5MbriN (affiliate)

// END OF THREAD //
If you enjoyed this thread please like + RT the top tweet!

For everyone that buys from my link,

I will throw in a 15 minute consultation call for free!

More from Marketing

The emergence of many new hypocrisies typically heralds an emerging new cultural synthesis.

Are you disturbed that you agree with one of those viewpoints? Or perhaps that other people you respect do?

1/x


Let me offer a framework for thinking about things like this, something called an “Omega Event.”

It was first described to me by Erik Martin, one of Reddit's first community managers:

In governance, Omega Events exist due to the fact that no system of beliefs, no worldview, no set of rules, can account for everything that will ever happen.

Eventually someone (or some group) will do something that lies outside the scope of all existing rules, and you will have to make decisions again from first principles.

Sometimes the Omega Event emerges from the confluence of many unrelated factors. When it does, it is wholly different from anything you’ve encountered.
Copywriting is a superpower.

Learn it and you can sell just about anything.

Use these 7 threads to master copywriting in the next 5 min 🧵

1. How to Write like an


2. 13 ways Apple Persuades Readers With Their


3. Master Business


4. 8 Timeless Copywriting Tips From David

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.