1/🧵 Good #DataScience advice that breaks pretty much every rule you learned in class... a thread. (+full blog post linked)
English version: https://t.co/dG4l6vPFBT
Spanish version: https://t.co/gFAjPQ5clS
#AI #MachineLearning #Statistics #RStats
For more info: https://t.co/Ue332SMjy1
More from Machine learning
For any Learning machines out there, here are a list of my fav online investing resources. Feel free to add yours.
Let's dive in.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Investing Services
✔️ @themotleyfool - @TMFStockAdvisor & @TMFRuleBreakers services
✔️ @7investing
✔️ @investing_city
https://t.co/9aUK1Tclw4
✔️ @MorningstarInc Premium
✔️ @SeekingAlpha Marketplaces (Check your area of interest, Free trials, Quality, track record...)
General Finance/Investing
✔️ @morganhousel
https://t.co/f1joTRaG55
✔️ @dollarsanddata
https://t.co/Mj1owkzRc8
✔️ @awealthofcs
https://t.co/y81KHfh8cn
✔️ @iancassel
https://t.co/KEMTBHa8Qk
✔️ @InvestorAmnesia
https://t.co/zFL3H2dk6s
✔️
Tech focused
✔️ @stratechery
https://t.co/VsNwRStY9C
✔️ @bgurley
https://t.co/NKXGtaB6HQ
✔️ @CBinsights
https://t.co/H77hNp2X5R
✔️ @benedictevans
https://t.co/nyOlasCY1o
✔️
Tech Deep dives
✔️ @StackInvesting
https://t.co/WQ1yBYzT2m
✔️ @hhhypergrowth
https://t.co/kcLKITRLz1
✔️ @Beth_Kindig
https://t.co/CjhLRdP7Rh
✔️ @SeifelCapital
https://t.co/CXXG5PY0xX
✔️ @borrowed_ideas
Two questions. 1/ Does this summarise the AZ published data :
The plan is to extend the time interval for all age groups despite it being largely untested on the over 55yrs, although the full data is not yet published
SUMMARY: the Oxford/Astra trial examined dosing with gaps between 4-12 wks- although longer gaps appear to be limited mostly to younger participants. There was no difference reported in published data between these & efficacy from the 1st dose seems high for severe disease.
— Deepti Gurdasani (@dgurdasani1) December 31, 2020
Do we have the actual numbers of over 55yr olds given a 2nd dose at c12 weeks and the accompanying efficacy data?
Not to mention the efficacy data of the full first dose over that same period?
I’d quite like to know whether I am to be a guinea pig & the ongoing risks to manage
You attached photos of excerpts from a paper. Could you attach the link?
Re Pfizer. As I understand it the most efficacious interval for dosing was investigated at the start of the trial.
Discussions of 1 vs 2 doses suggest many are not aware of Pfizer's trials which evaluated 1 vs 2 dose immunogenicity, assessed multiple formulations (BNT162b1 BNT162b2 etc) & conducted dose-ranging in both young & old adults at the start. Saw "clear benefit of booster at day 21" pic.twitter.com/mpyxu9xFSF
— Dr Nicole E Basta (@IDEpiPhD) December 31, 2020
Here’s the link to the
I’ve got to say that this way of making and announcing decisions is not inspiring confidence in me and I am very pro vaccination as a matter of principle, not least because my brother caught polio before vaccinations available.
❓ Today, I want to start discussing the different types of Machine Learning flavors we can find.
This is a very high-level overview. In later threads, we'll dive deeper into each paradigm... 👇🧵
Last time we talked about how Machine Learning works.
Basically, it's about having some source of experience E for solving a given task T, that allows us to find a program P which is (hopefully) optimal w.r.t. some metric
I'm starting a Twitter series on #FoundationsOfML. Today, I want to answer this simple question.
— Alejandro Piad Morffis (@AlejandroPiad) January 12, 2021
\u2753 What is Machine Learning?
This is my preferred way of explaining it... \U0001f447\U0001f9f5
According to the nature of that experience, we can define different formulations, or flavors, of the learning process.
A useful distinction is whether we have an explicit goal or desired output, which gives rise to the definitions of 1️⃣ Supervised and 2️⃣ Unsupervised Learning 👇
1️⃣ Supervised Learning
In this formulation, the experience E is a collection of input/output pairs, and the task T is defined as a function that produces the right output for any given input.
👉 The underlying assumption is that there is some correlation (or, in general, a computable relation) between the structure of an input and its corresponding output and that it is possible to infer that function or mapping from a sufficiently large number of examples.
You May Also Like
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Project: Lifelog
— Robert Horan (@Robby12692) December 13, 2018
Started by DARPA in 1999, the goal of Lifelog was to create a database on civilians without their knowledge, and track everything they do.
The project "ended" on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook began the exact same day.
The CIA funneled tens of millions into Facebook. pic.twitter.com/r7hwF0v9kh
Pentagon Kills LifeLog