The fact that we can't agree anymore on simple truths keeps me up at night.

In science we agreed on core values or rules where everyone could empirically check the assertion made.
Heck we built in mechanism to challenge core beliefs and get them universally accepted.
It's not the forbearance of decorum or independent thought.
It's not even one of those close, disputed scientific advances waiting on more data to be settled.
It's not even a highly disputed nor controversial research with credible counter research
It is particularly triggering being born into dictatorship and we spent our lifetimes crying out every election.
The result has been two men, father, son, shared power for 65 years.
We bought into these ideals to hold these undeniable 'truths' that all men are created equal.
Especially, when powerless all of your life, you've had a seat at table of ruthless repression.
We bought into democracy. Regardless of our imperfect. Cough. EC.
All people "seemingly" equal... Side effect includes... Imperfect, but at least respected.
You can only choose to embrace one truth.
Relentless rebuttal to your own believes, nevertheless.
It's sad the line in the sand is at seeking and accepting your truth.
Leaving consensus to history. May it be kind to you
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Life

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".

You May Also Like

First thread of the year because I have time during MCO. As requested, a thread on the gods and spirits of Malay folk religion. Some are indigenous, some are of Indian origin, some have Islamic


Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits

Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their


Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time

Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods