I'm slightly obsessed with this "#PenceCard" nonsense which is like the Platonic ideal of the current level of Trump election stealing conspiracy theory nonsense.
Which was a week ago, incidentally.
I expect there will be some meltdowns, but probably even more people seamlessly pivoting to "Well obviously he wouldn't do it in public." or "It's actually January 6th."
Small problem is: he's a defendant in that case, not a plaintiff.
https://t.co/kmPoiQ3KYa
The only really notable feature of the absurd new election lawsuit in D.C. is that the plaintiffs sued Mike Pence in his official capacity, meaning I suppose that the Justice Department will now be obliged to defend him from the many pages of absurdity. https://t.co/PqKLZHWtSI pic.twitter.com/bUc9uWMnD6
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) December 22, 2020
https://t.co/Agqr6NmrbG
There is actually some mystery here. As much as I'd love to see it dismissed under Fed R Civ P 12(b)(1-7)(inclusive), it will probably be narrower. In which case we're looking at any or all of a considerable number of plausible options.
— Mike Dunford (@questauthority) December 23, 2020
Specifically: https://t.co/zv4zMESxZs
https://t.co/4i8Qzz3yLJ
Also, good luck attempting service on the Electoral College, which isn't really an organization or a thing. This is like suing "the states."
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) December 22, 2020
Prison inmates who represent themselves generally avoid goofy stuff like this. pic.twitter.com/Cvbk7v5zzO
More from Alexandra Erin the Meadow We Can Build a Snowman
(DC POLICE) MPD CHIEF : "There was no intelligence that suggests that there would be a breach of the US Capitol. "
— Chris Cioffi (@ReporterCioffi) January 7, 2021
One of the most significant problems a lot of Democrats and the liberal commentariat have been allowing themselves to be hampered by is an adherence to some sort of notion of the sacrosanct nature of institutions as those institutions are burning down because people won\u2019t act.
— Dr. Sunny Moraine PhD is carrying the fire (@dynamicsymmetry) January 8, 2021
More from Law
Over and over again, judges have gone out of their way to listen to the evidence and dismantle it, enjoy the carnage!
1/
Bowyer v. Ducey (Sidney Powell's case in Arizona)
"Plaintiffs have not moved the
needle for their fraud theory from conceivable to plausible"
This is a great opinion to start with. The Judge completely dismantles the nonsense brought before her.
2/
https://t.co/F2vllUhM2G

King vs. Whitmer (Michigan, Sidney Powell case)
"Nothing but speculation and conjecture"
This is a good one to show people who think affidavits are good evidence. Notice how the affidavits don't actually say they saw fraud happen in Detroit.
3/
https://t.co/NZAtqivWkL

Trump v. Benson (Michigan)
"hearsay within hearsay"
Another good one to show people who think affidavits are absolute proof.
4/
https://t.co/17GeGhImHF

Stoddard v. City Election Commission (Michigan)
"mere speculation"
/5
https://t.co/ekqYEqiIL9
