JUBLFOOD
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 4058.33 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/DPEehZwkS4
JUBLFOOD
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) June 24, 2020
Achieved the second target of 1820 today, now near the first target of 1780!
Got a nice 15-20% move till now.
Trailing stop loss is the best thing one can do now! https://t.co/YidPZamyxz
More from Saket Reddy
Today's closing is a monthly close and this is done & dusted, we now have a solid monthly close above the 10 year supply zone.
If the stock has broken out from a 10 year supply zone & a 20 year peak, surely something would've changed!
Do study the industry structure! https://t.co/zA3qztFzon
SAREGAMA at a very important juncture now on the monthly chart considering today's close is also a monthly close.
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) May 31, 2021
Nearing a breakout from over a 10 year supply zone! https://t.co/qpsSn3obrE pic.twitter.com/1xTmB6WvhK
Double Top Buy above 2233.36 daily close on 1% Box size chart. https://t.co/Grtz9Pi3vU
MINDTREE
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) December 22, 2020
The company is an international information technology consulting and implementation organisation that delivers business solutions through global software development.
DTB above 1619.22 daily close on 3% box size chart, DTB active on 1% chart. https://t.co/dhQmouQ9Wt pic.twitter.com/g8Rgz7fA0A
More from Jublfood
You May Also Like
Week 1 highlights: getting shortlisted for YC W2019🤞, acquiring a premium domain💰, meeting Substack's @hamishmckenzie and Stripe CEO @patrickc 🤩
2/ So what is Brew?
brew / bru : / to make (beer, coffee etc.) / verb: begin to develop 🌱
A place for you to enjoy premium content while supporting your favorite creators. Sort of like a ‘Consumer-facing Patreon’ cc @jackconte
(we’re still working on the pitch)
3/ So, why be so transparent? Two words: launch strategy.
jk 😅 a) I loooove doing something consistently for a long period of time b) limited downside and infinite upside (feedback, accountability, reach).
cc @altimor, @pmarca
4/ https://t.co/GOQJ7LjQ2t domain 🍻
It started with a cold email. Guess what? He was using BuyMeACoffee on his blog, and was excited to hear about what we're building next. Within 2w, we signed the deal at @Escrowcom's SF office. You’re a pleasure to work with @MichaelCyger!
5/ @ycombinator's invite for the in-person interview arrived that evening. Quite a day!
Thanks @patio11 for the thoughtful feedback on our YC application, and @gabhubert for your directions on positioning the product — set the tone for our pitch!
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?