LTTS
Double Top Buy above 4854.36 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/KsAg2ZAwCF
LTTS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) March 2, 2021
Double Top Buy above 2753.05 daily close on 1% Box Size Chart and Double Top Buy active on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/5VpG2455C2 pic.twitter.com/q0yZXgqatt
More from Saket Reddy
JBCHEPHARM
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg
JBCHEPHARM
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) July 16, 2021
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish and T20 Pattern - Bullish triggered above 1886.26 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/bzIsbWjbEP pic.twitter.com/JQVkao635V
HAVELLS
Double Top Buy above 1485.56 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/zY8JwRIZUu
Double Top Buy above 1485.56 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/zY8JwRIZUu
HAVELLS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) August 30, 2021
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 1266.91 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/78Tb2dKZkm pic.twitter.com/4lWz25jGgk
More from Ltts
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x