BC ITSTHLEARNINGS
Saved by @SAnngeri

It's the weekend!

Grab a cup of coffee, in this thread we will explore

1. What is risk management?
2. What is position sizing?
3. How to apply both these concepts to reduce volatility and drawdowns in your portfolio?

Lets dive right in.

 What does losing $20 Billion in 24 hours and A Bank being sold for less than $1, have in common?

The answer is Risk Management.
Through this thread we will explore 2 stories - Stories that will teach us the importance of risk management and position sizing in a portfolio.
These stories will show you that no matter

How Rich You Are
How Respected You Are
How Educated You Are

Improper risk management will blow up your portfolio and most likely bankrupt you.
Our first story is the story of Bill Hwang and the saga of Archegos Capital Management.
Bill Hwang was a somewhat a prodigy in finance and one of the wealthiest individual in US with a net worth of $20 Billion.
Bill Hwang had a modest upbringing, his family immigrated to the US from South Korea in 1980s. Soon after immigrating to US, his father passed away and Bill Hwang took up the night shift at a local McDonalds to help feed his family.
From these modest roots, Bill Hwang climbed up the ladder of finance and became one the most revered fund managers at Tiger Management started by the legendary hedge fund manager Julian Robertson.
Bill Hwang had to eventually shut down his hedge fund called Tiger Asia and from the proceeds of that fund he started his family office called Archegos Capital Management.
At Archegos, Bill Hwang turned $200 Million of his own money into $20 Billion in under 7 years.
Despite this wealth, Bill Hwang lived a modest living. He had a single house in suburban New Jersey and drive a Hyundai SUV.

No luxury houses and cars for him.
March 22, 2021

Viacom CBS announces a stock and convertible bond sale after market closes for that day.

Viacom wanted to raise money and for what so ever reason, market didn't like this new stock and bond sale from Viacom.
That week, Viacom CBS shares would lose 60% of its value.
And Bill Hwang would lose $20 Billion.
Why did Bill Hwang lose all his wealth with the drop of a single stock?

Cause, Bill Hwang was levered massively. He used a financial instrument called a total return swap (which is a type of OTC derivative) to leverage all his positions.
A simple 10% fall in any of his stocks was enough to trigger a margin call.
A margin call on one or two of his positions would have been fine, Bill would simply sell some of his other holdings to pay for the margin.
But, see as soon as the street realized that Archegos wasn't immediately able to pay for the margin call on Viacom shares, his other positions started to tank as well.
Bill had bought these Total Return Swaps with almost all the banks on Wall Street, if Bill wasn't able to fund his margin calls, these banks would be forced to liquidate his holdings and incur losses.
As these holdings were very large, the first bank to liquidate would be hurt the least.
Goldman Sachs was the first one to dump these holdings, Credit Suisse was the last.

Goldman escaped unscathed by this entire mess while Credit Suisse took one the biggest losses in their entire history.
As for Bill Hwang he lost it all, in matter of 24 hours.

$20 Billion, his life's earnings, all gone, poof, zero, zlich, nada!
The sad part is, all of Bill's stock holdings recovered most of their losses the next week, but because Bill was levered his portfolio didn't survive to see that day.
Lesson #1

Never take on leverage and never invest with borrowed money

Borrowed money is like the grim reaper that is waiting to kill your portfolio at the first instance

If a prodigy like Bill Hwang wasn't able to survive with leverage, why would you?
Had Bill hadn't leveraged himself, he would have survived and recovered most of his losses.
Bill was actually given the option by his banks to liquidate half his holdings and pay for the margin call. ~$10 Billion

After paying for the call, he would still be left with ~$10 Billion and live to survive another day.
Bill Hwang didn't agree to that.
Lesson #2

Be willing to take a loss.

No investment is without risk and knowing the risks in an investment will help you minimize losses if things go south.
Our second story highlights this lesson.
Barings Bank was one of the oldest bank in UK. At its prime, the Queen of England had an account there.

It was founded in 1762 and almost 233 years later in 1995, the Bank would be bought by ING for less than $1.
Barings hired a trader called Nick Leeson and Lesson single handedly bought the entire institution down.
Nick Leeson took on speculative trades in Japan's Nikkei's index during the Japanese market boom.

Leeson used to bet if the index would go up or down and if it moved in the direction he was betting he would make money.
Initially this worked and Leeson made a lot of money for the bank. The bank in return gave him a free leash and he was allowed to take as many trades irrespective of how speculative they were.
Just like with any bet that has 50:50 odds, these bets soon turned sour and Nick had to book losses.

Instead of stopping there Nick tried to recover these losses by hiding them from the Banks books and taking even larger bets in hopes that they would recover all the losses.
Nick would have maybe succeed too, had it not been for an earthquake in Japan that cause Nikkei to report one of the biggest single day falls.
Kobe Earthquake of 1995 was one of the most intense in Japan. While building his positions Leeson would have never imagined that an earthquake could occur and wipe his entire position and bring down his employer.
Lesson #3

You don't know, what you don't know.
If you're working with leverage and borrowed ideas then anything can wipe you out.

Your task as an investor is to be fully aware of every risk that the investment has.

The probability of some risks maybe higher than others but there is no investment with zero risk.
In each of these stories, the protagonist had made some common errors.

- They used excessive leverage
- They didn't know how to take a loss
- They threw risk management out the door
- Their positions didn't reflect the proper risk return ratio
Other than not taking any leverage, position sizing is extremely important in managing risk within a portfolio.
Here is an example of how I size my positions.

The three factors that I consider are

1. Margin of Safety
2. Depth of Research
3. Longevity of Earnings
Only when an opportunity checks of all three boxes is when I try to take a position in.

If my depth of research and longevity of earnings in a position is high then I will start with a small allocation and allocate big if margin of safety increases.
Risk comes from not knowing what you own and not from concentrating into positions you own.

Diversifying into 50 stocks will not eliminate the risk from your portfolio.

Knowing majority of risks of all 10 stocks you own will certainly help you manage it.
Look at the positions you own, determine their margin of safety, be honest with yourself about your depth of research and determine the longevity of earnings for these businesses.

You will get your answer on how much to allocate.
With this, we come to an end of this thread.
I hope this helped you understand what not to do and how to size positions in your portfolio.
If you find this thread useful then follow me
@itsTarH

I write a new thread every weekend.

All my previous work, can be found here.
https://t.co/az1Rsw05TO
I also teach a class on Personal Finance, if you're interested.

Sign up using the link below to get free 30 days access to it.

https://t.co/NWZOPx8dvW

https://t.co/r7uNYuqjsn
Also, write and publish long from articles on my substack (https://t.co/pOJSMEyzOn)

Subscribe for free, if you're interested.

Thank you to the 2000+ of you who already have!

Here is a recent deep dive I wrote on PolicyBazaar.
https://t.co/w14k2xE0fQ
If you want to know more about Archegos and Barnings Bank, here are two great videos that will help you learn.
Archegos Capital Management
https://t.co/XwPpgIV60D
Barings Bank
https://t.co/rSkzSCNvJj
Thank you for reading, please retweet the first tweet in this thread for a broader reach.

See you all next weekend!

More from Tar ⚡

Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Long Duration Contracts and Electricity Derivatives to be launched on IEX soon

Aims to increase Electricity Traded on Exchange to 25% by 2025 from current 5.5%

#IEX

https://t.co/mDJHAfvv0K
ALL , CATEGORY
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Phillip Capital note on #Prajindustries
PRAJ , PRAJWAL
Advertisement
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
It's the weekend!

Grab a cup of coffee, in this thread I will explain

1. Peter Lynch's Six Categories of Stocks
2. How to identify the type of stock you own?
3. How to think and decide about the runway for growth of a company?

Lets dive right in.


For those who do not know (I doubt there will be many), Peter Lynch is one of the most successful fund managers of all time.

He managed a fund called Magellan at US Investment Giant Fidelity Investments and during his 13 yr tenure, he delivered an average CAGR of 29.2%.


Sadly the fund couldn't keep up post Lynch's retirement and his successors weren't able to keep up with his returns.

That's how good Lynch was!


In 1989, a year before retirement, Lynch wrote and published a book called 'One Up on Wall Street'.

Almost 32 years later, the teachings of the book remain relevant.

(Highly recommended read)


Chapter 7 of the Book Titled
"I've Got It, I've Got It - What is It?"

talks about the need to classify stocks.

Peter's argument is that you need to know what kind of stock you hold in your portfolio.

Not all stocks are the same - and he is right!
STOCKSLEARNINGS , LEARNSTOCKS , LEARNING
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
#JUBLINGREA

Jubilant Ingrevia has broken Channel and RSI support for the first time since listing

In the absence of any immediate short term triggers, a sideways to down move is more likely than further upmoves.


FAQ's

Q. Am I selling?
A. No, I do not sell long term stocks

Q. Am I buying?
A. No, I am not

Q. When will I buy?
A. I don't know

Q. What is my Stop Loss?
A. I don't have any

Q. What is my Avg price?
A. Less than 350

Q. How to handle volatility?
A. I live for it
JUBLIANTINGREVIA
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Wanted to invest in US Stocks?
Next couple of months are good for bottom fishing

High growth stocks with sky high valuations will finally come down to Earth🌎

My shopping list includes the below

Planet Labs
Rocket Lab
Upstart
Coupang
QS
Roblox
Ginkgo Bioworks

High Risk 🅾️

Two frequent questions

1. What website to use for data?
https://t.co/8A7w6qX4VQ

2. How do

Ans'ing other Qs, don't know all the companies, there are too many to track & I stick with what I know

Don't feel FOMO, entire year high growth names will correct

Hunt for picks within recent SPACs, most are duds, but higher chances you find a
US STOCKS

More from Itsthlearnings

Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Asset Allocation doesn't have one clear answer and shouldn't depend on stage of the market.

It depends on your

- Risk Appetite
- Goals
- Psychology
- Age
- Responsibilities

1/n https://t.co/aJjy4N90J9


Someone who is

Young
Right out of College
Doesn't Need Money for Next 10 years
Doesn't Have any Dependents

should be allocated more towards Equities than someone who is

Old
Heading for Retirement
Needs Consistent Income
Has Many Dependents

2/n

Your psychology also has the biggest impact. Are you someone who gets afraid and loses sleep over 5 to 10% drawdowns and wants to book profits as soon as an investment gains in value

or Are you someone who can sit peacefully and do not let the daily movement of market impact you

Also allocate based on Goals.

(Extract taken from my Personal Finance Course, Releasing on SkillShare on Sunday, link to sign up for a Free access below)

https://t.co/IdBvCqO2DH
ITSTHLEARNINGS
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
All my Threads so far 🧵 👇🏼

The One with the Cash Flow Explained


The One with Free Cash Flow Explained


The One with Mutual Funds


The One on Laurus Labs
ITSTHLEARNINGS , ALL , INVESTING
Advertisement
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
This is pretty much all there is to valuations 👇🏼 I personally follow this same process.

(Excuse the handwriting, rough notes from CFA L2 Equity Valuations)
ITSTHLEARNINGS , ALL
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Saw a few posts where #LaurusLabs is being floated as 100x candidate from here.

That would mean it would need a market cap of 35 lakh crore+ ($466 Billion) to achieve that goal.

Not going to happen.

Most optimistic goal is a 3 lakh cr market cap ($40 Billion) in next 10 yrs.

Don't fall for accounts selling you false hope
Apply some common sense

Folks who bought Laurus at its lowest of Rs 52 per share may (Big May) see a 100 bagger, entering now will not

Laurus is my largest position, so this is not a criticism, just setting realistic expectations
ITSTHLEARNINGS
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Corrected my mistake today, bought #Mastek

First identified it at 1100, by the time I finished researching it went to 1800 Thought will wait and invest at pull back. Soon it was at 2800+

Bought today at 2375
15% of PF
ITSTHLEARNINGS , ALL

You May Also Like

katya adler
katya adler
@BBCkatyaadler
Again, at such a key moment in UK and at such high political levels, evidence of deep misunderstanding of EU: The PM is under pressure in some quarters to delay #Brexit vote to allow her first to “improve” deal in Brussels BUT EU is determined not to budge at this stage

2) All EU leaders watching tomorrow’s vote. Of course they want to avoid a no deal #Brexit BUT they feel the deal - so painfully negotiated between EU and UK - is too fresh to re-open. Clarifications, yes but fundamental renegotiations, no.

3) The EU’s international reputation as a tough deal-maker is at stake here too. If Brussels now suddenly “gives in” to U.K. on EU red lines (eg backstop) then that would weaken the EU’s reputation in future trade negotiations with other non EU countries

4) Also on backstop the EU is unlikely to cave in to favour a relationship with a leaving member state (UK) against the explicit wishes and ignoring the deep concerns of a continuing member: Ireland.

5) Both the EU and the PM signed up to a guarantee to protect the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. If either the U.K. or EU can leave the backstop unilaterally then this clearly is no longer a guarantee.
POLITICS
k\u0101rthik \u0b95\u0bbe\u0bb0\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bcd\u0ba4\u0bbf\u0b95\u0bcd \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0924\u093f\u0915 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 | Sanatani
kārthik கார்த்திக் कार...
@almightykarthik
Hello Dear Tweeples!

It’s Siddhars time of the week! Last week I shared story of Guru (Machamuni or Yogi Matsyendranath), this week I bring you information on his Shishya.

#Thread on Gorakanathar Siddhar.

@LostTemple7


His origin story is interesting, though I couldn’t verify it’s authenticity, so not sharing the story here. He’s shishya of Machamuni Siddhar and also learnt from Agasthiya Siddhar.

@HelloNNewman @RajiIndustani @Kishoreciyer1

Unlike other Siddhars, he is depicted as either with a Tiger or seated & wearing Tiger skin. While I couldn’t find any explanation for this. My interpretation is as follows:

Tiger is a predator that lurks around and attacks unexpectedly.


Our 5 indriyas and 5 vikitis also similar to Tiger, they lurk around and attacks our thoughts when we’re least expecting. Gorakkar is said to have mastered these aspects, thus to denote this, he shown with Tiger.

@Itishree001 @VarierSangitha @jananisampath

Gorakanathar or Gorakshnath (as he’s known in the Nath Sampraday) is celebrated Guru in both Northern and Southern part of India. He’s one of the NavNath in Nath Sampraday and also 18 Siddhars of Tamil tradition. During his life, he’s travelled Indian subcontinent extensively +
RELIGION , ALL
Advertisement
Noah Smith
Noah Smith
@Noahpinion
Met a Brazilian-American Lyft driver from San Diego who passionately attacked the racism of Republicans, then switched to passionately defending Bolsonaro.

If I were Thomas Friedman, I could tell you what this means.

Met a Haitian-American in a restaurant who said he'd always vote for Democrats because of the immigration issue, but that he has conservative beliefs too. "I don't want to pay for someone's abortion!", he declared.

Met a Latino Lyft driver from San Jose who said that while he was liberal, California was getting too liberal for him and he was considering moving to San Antonio.

Again, not being Tom Friedman, I am unable to offer any commentary on the political and policy implications of these conversations.

I guess my only thought is that political opinions are pretty complex and multidimensional, out there in the real world.

(end)
POLITICS
Formula 1
Formula 1
@F1
After 17 years and more than 300 races, it could be @alo_oficial's last F1 race on Sunday 😭 He's given us a lot over the years... including some superb GIFs!

Here we have a rare example of a GIF you can actually hear. TOMA. 💪


The Spanish Samurai


Never give up. 💪 #GraciasFernando


Winning is everything. #GraciasFernando
SPORT
Alex Stamos
Alex Stamos
@alexstamos
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
TECH