
Neither https://t.co/00NDYv81XX nor https://t.co/3tPOCsz4Yf are swadeshi!!
Friends, not everyone is technical and we Indians are very fragile to fall into the trap when people whom we trust mislead you.
I'll be proving this in the thread and will guide you to check it yourself.

1. https://t.co/LTrVdSOQHw (109.73.160.221)
2. https://t.co/SOFzVJWNdC (52.219.133.12)
Let's now find out with these IPs where they're hosted...
1. https://t.co/JsCSIfeH6Q
2. https://t.co/JXjPuBoQBM
First one is a RIPE IP and second one is ARIN, European and American IP network respectively.
1. https://t.co/kTgtVCnRkg
2. https://t.co/4wxWQhyMEN
They are owned by HostDime UK and Amazon Technologies USA.
Note that the Asian(Handling IP for India) counterpart of these are APNIC.
Open https://t.co/DVCjdBvhQL in a new tab and search https://t.co/LTrVdSOQHw after completing captcha there.
Results is kind of shocking to me...

Last when I read .in domains don't allow private/hidden whois, which I need to reconfirm as I am not up-to-date on policies since a few years.
2. Is it bad to operate like this? NO. But claiming Swadeshi is almost a crime unless they change this and they don't keep the data within Indian borders.
3. Owners of all the data are ...
These orgs are known to share data with govt when asked to and can shut down when they don't like it (remember Parler on AWS)?
1. https://t.co/9oisFqNT51 (64.225.84.69)
Let's find out where this IP is hosted...

This is an ARIN IP and owned by DigitalOcean US. Let's confirm this with ARIN for clarity
1. https://t.co/kGTTvD3jUC
Yes, DigitalOcean US, 100% confirmed with address/email and phone. Remember Indian IP would be under APNIC.
Open https://t.co/DVCjdBvhQL and query https://t.co/9oisFqNT51.
Shocking indeed...

Wow for people like @nanda8tooter who claim SWADESHI with all this - https://t.co/BPZfLMDbzW
Also, https://t.co/PvLGUy1ILn it's clear this is just a clone of gab-social
More from India
1/n
On Feb 25, 2021 we published an analysis of the draft IT Rules, 2021. Alongside the analysis is a rundown of the contentious history of the Rules and the need for starting afresh on this vital conversation about platform accountability. Thread
\U0001f6a8 Breaking: We are releasing a copy of the Draft IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which seek to change the face of how digital media is governed in India.
— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) February 25, 2021
Read our thread and analysis of the biggest concerns.
1/nhttps://t.co/zQnCGTgGzz
On Feb 25, 2021, the IT Rules, 2021 came into force. On Feb 27, 2021, we shared with you our comprehensive deep-dive into the Rules - an overview of its contents, the “safeguards” it seeks to establish, and how they affect your fundamental rights.
It's done: The IT Rules, 2021, are officially in play. We cannot stress this enough - this fundamentally changes the Indian internet. Please RT this thread on the Rules and how they bring government control over digital media like never before.https://t.co/S7K9wnIkvI
— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) February 27, 2021
1/n
We're also talking directly to young people and making sure that they are empowered with knowledge about their digital rights w.r.t. the IT Rules, 2021. Watch our video explaining the background of the Rules and the crux of the matter in 5
Currently, public analysis including our own provides a broad overview of concerns. Since new IT Rules are here to stay, we're also providing you with segmented explainers. Our simple video on how the new Rules will affect digital news
How do the IT Rules, 2021 affect digital news media?
— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) March 3, 2021
Our video explains the 4 biggest implications in 5 minutes - simply and directly. Everyone and specially journalists, please RT and share this critical info on social media, WA, Signal!https://t.co/iZ0Ya0gU8K
You May Also Like
View the resolutions and voting results here:
The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.
Israel and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr

The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.
Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab

The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.
Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF

The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.
Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW
