The cor*na hoax thread. How and why, best as I can tell. First, how does the new virus work? The vast majority of cases are asymptomatic or indistinguishable from the common cold. A small minority of cases affect the lungs. But how it does should be clarified...

The virus doesn't cause pneumonia. Was often mistaken for pneu. at first, but doesn't cause the lungs to fill with fluid. Nor does it cause the failure of the lungs to pump; rather, it impairs the lungs' ability to absorb oxygen on a cellular level...
It also seems like it never fully destroys the lungs' ability to do this. From personal friends who've developed severe illness, like "having someone sitting on your chest". But I've never heard of a single cor*na death attributed to brain death due to no oxygen...
Rather, the stress caused by low oxygen makes some other organ "pop" first. The media is very vague on how it kills you, because you might start to put two and two together. That organ is almost always the heart. Lowered oxygen causes elevated heart rates. Sound familiar?
Yeah. The effects of the new virus on the body are indistinguishable from... moderate aerobic exercise. The only people who've died from the virus are -those who a light jog would kill-. What category is that? Does the data bear me out?
Well, just about the only people who would die from moderate exercise are people who were going to die shortly anyway. And guess what, according to the now-cancelled Johns Hopkins data analysis, every rona death corresponds with an expected "old age" death that didn't happen
1500 rona deaths in a state in a month corresponds exactly to heart attack, stroke, cancer deaths being down 1500 for that place and time. Not killing the grandmas who have a year to live, killing people who have two weeks to live
Social security payouts, April excepted, and we will get to April, are no lower than expected. SS does not pay out to dead people. Either all fake, or rona deaths are of people who would have died that month anyway.
So, why? What happened? How was the hoax perpetrated? In Nov19, China saw some cases of anomalous "pneumonia". Guesswork here, but they probably quickly determined that the new virus was not a threat. But, because the symptoms are scary, could be a very useful political tool
After that decision was made, they staged a fake lockdown, complete with overdramatic measures like sprayer trucks and hazmat suits, construction of fake hospitals (by now put to some other purpose no doubt) and only then told the WHO that they had a pandemic on their hands.
Initial political response to the virus in the west was mixed and confused, mostly correctly dismissive, until the scripts changed overnight on some central order, and the media started blasting full on panic. Blue empire was all on script, indicating central command...
...while red empire was not receiving any kind of marching order, continued to be confused. The new virus had been on our shores since dec19, everyone has a story about a weird flu from then, but only started producing deaths in Mar20.
Several blue state governors, under immense pressure to produce patients and deaths, began putting virus patients in nursing homes, and in April we do see a dip in SS payouts, actual excess deaths, which were gone by May, when the weak they could kill were killed.

More from Health

No-regret #hydrogen:
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.

👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em


The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic
https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)

Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)


Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)


In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)
Now you know I love to sh-t in Harvard. But I also like accuracy. So I decided to go look at Harvard’s catalog to see its lack of military history that this article describes (they only teach history of pets it claims) and what I found shocked me! Shocked me! A thread: 1/


First off, Harvard students literally have multiple sections of military history that they can take listed. (It appears these ones are taught at MIT, so they might have to walk down the street for these) but... 2/


Say they want to stay on campus...they can only take numerous classes on war and diplomacy...3/


They have an entire class on Yalta. That’s right. An entire class on Yalta. 4/


But wait! There is more! They can take the British Empire, The Fall of the Roman Empire for those wanting traditional topics... 5/

You May Also Like