Do y’all want Medicare for All or do you want to just keep talking about wanting Medicare for All
Wouldn’t it be cool to vote on Medicare for All if Democrats hold the House and Senate?
Are any of the people yelling about forcing a vote trying to help Dems win in Georgia?
I don’t understand what’s happening on the dirtbag left right now. I truly don’t.
Do y’all want Medicare for All or do you want to just keep talking about wanting Medicare for All
Why are you screaming at AOC and not screaming about Georgia?
Being contrarian and whipping up outrage is a brand for some of you.
But what do I know. I’m just a foreclosure lawyer who fell off a turnip truck
how serious can these people be about actually passing Medicare for all when they have said absolutely nothing about electing Dems in Georgia. Explain it to me like I’m 5.
Tweets for DAAAAAAAYS.
These folks make money by keeping people angry. 30k a month on patreon. 1.9 million dollar homes. So why would they help Dems win.
I’m just calling it like I see it.
They’re willing to work within the system. So it’s not me being a bootlicker asking them to work within the system in another way.
If not, then I’m not either
More from Health
This is a limited point about availability of efficacy data for vaccines under development in the context of the approval for CovidShield and Covaxin in India.
There have been many so-called experts on the idiotbox opining about apparent availability of P III data which 1/n
2/n apparently the SEC had access to based on which it "supposedly" approved Covaxin. Another argument that is prevalent is other regulators (US FDA and MHRA) also approved vaccines based on P II data alone. Let me give you a few facts so that you can make your own decision.
3/n The protocols for both mRNA vaccines are publicly available. You can check. Both protocols *define* when the interim analysis will be done. This is not subjective. They clearly define how many infections need to be documented before the Data Safety Monitoring Board meets.
4/n Find the protocols for the bridging study for CovidShield and Covaxin and look for a similar milestone.
Here is one set of efficacy data post the interim analysis of a mRNA vaccine.
Source: https://t.co/BAPnP3PxEb
5/n This data was analyzed post the interim analysis where the blind was broken by the DSMB. Now ask yourself this question:
How does the SEC, or the sponsor of these studies, or the experts who are offering their opinion liberally on the idiotbox know what the efficacy is
There have been many so-called experts on the idiotbox opining about apparent availability of P III data which 1/n
2/n apparently the SEC had access to based on which it "supposedly" approved Covaxin. Another argument that is prevalent is other regulators (US FDA and MHRA) also approved vaccines based on P II data alone. Let me give you a few facts so that you can make your own decision.
3/n The protocols for both mRNA vaccines are publicly available. You can check. Both protocols *define* when the interim analysis will be done. This is not subjective. They clearly define how many infections need to be documented before the Data Safety Monitoring Board meets.
4/n Find the protocols for the bridging study for CovidShield and Covaxin and look for a similar milestone.
Here is one set of efficacy data post the interim analysis of a mRNA vaccine.
Source: https://t.co/BAPnP3PxEb
5/n This data was analyzed post the interim analysis where the blind was broken by the DSMB. Now ask yourself this question:
How does the SEC, or the sponsor of these studies, or the experts who are offering their opinion liberally on the idiotbox know what the efficacy is