While #Tulane school of medicine is rightfully being exposed for its contemporary racism towards faculty, staff, students (and patients) due to the racist firing of Dr. Princess Dennar, it’s important to call out the deeply anti-Black history of this school, specifically... 1/

The way #Tulane became a private institution (originally was a public university) at the end of Reconstruction to avoid having to desegregate. The school charter says it was founded for “white men” only... but there’s more (much more) to this story... 2/
cw: medical racism

Tulane’s school of medicine rose to national prominence for its collection of human “specimens” in their anatomy museum “rivaled only by Harvard”. How did it acquire these “specimens” you might ask?

The collection was “curated” by a Dr. Edward Souchon... 3/
Dr. Souchon was mentored by the late James Marion Sims, the “father of modern gynecology”, who himself had started collecting body parts, organs, and skeletal remains from enslaved Black people during slavery. Souchon continued “curating” his own collection in horrific ways. 4/
The Souchon Collection grew over several decades, eventually touring the state as a traveling “public health” exhibit- nearly all of the body parts stolen, harvested and illicitly acquired from formerly enslaved and poor Black people via Charity Hospital. 5/
In the early 1900s Tulane would even advertise its anatomy collection to attract medical school applicants from across the country, bragging that their Dr.’s had “trained” as physicians to enslaved Black people and therefore knew about the “peculiarities” of Black bodies. 6/
This of course was true in that one of Tulane’s most famous founding physicians was Dr. Samuel Cartwright, who famously invented diseases like “Drapetomania” to justify enslavement and prescribed brutal violence as a cure. https://t.co/5IMEq0zdcP 7/
Tulane’s school of medicine continued to receive a “bounty” of Black bodies through a special arrangement w/ Charity Hospital, which often supplied the school with so many cadavers per month that they often didn’t know what to do with them... but it’s for science right? Wrong. 8/
Tulane med school students (all white men at the time) were known to pose for raunchy and racist photos with the cadavers. During the New Deal, WPA oral historians recorded numerous stories about the “Black bottle men” or “needle men” who would steal human at night... 9/
There was a widespread belief in Black New Orleans communities that Tulane med school students would hide in the allies at night and use anasthesias to knock out unsuspecting Black victims to harvest their bodies for experiments and dissections. It’s easy to understand why. 10/
Charity Hospital was also suspected of delivering substandard medical care to poor Black, indigent patients- letting them die- to help supply the flow of Black cadavers to Tulane. It’s nearly impossible to confirm these facts now, but one can imagine why ppl thought this. 11/
Through a range of nefarious methods (enslavement, exploitation, shady deals), Dr. Edward Souchon built up his anatomy “collection”- robbing the deceased and their families of the right to perform sacred traditional African burial customs, dehumanizing & profiting off them 12/
This “Souchon Collection” was still proudly exhibited by Tulane med school until it started to draw negative attention, and for many decades now has been hidden in the basement of the Hutchinson building downtown. Still, faculty access it to show their students... 13/
Tulane must acknowledge the Anti-Black history of the Souchon Collection, work to repatriate all human remains to surviving family, provide reparations & facilitate proper burial rights. This is an abomination and this racist legacy and present situation must be addressed. END

More from Health

1/
Remember woman who tuk multiple @SriSriTattva products 4 range of problems frm diabetes 2 gas 2 liver disease & developed liver failure, listed for liver transplant?
Here is original thread:
https://t.co/PXxI1Slyv2
23 samples, Analysis results
#MedTwitter #livertwitter


2/
Before I go into results, I must say this was overwhelming. There was SO MUCH the lab identified, impossible to put everything here. So I made a summary. At the end of this thread, I have linked a full analysis described in Excel format. Some results were VERY concerning

3/
How did we analyse?
Here R links 2 methods
They R high end, done under strict protocols
Frm Ministry of Forest, Environment, Climate / NABL approvd Lab
ICP-OES https://t.co/O1CLhqVQAu
GC MSMS https://t.co/zRJoXyWQIr
FTIR https://t.co/goAembQ08p
Here is list V analysed 👇


4/
Sample names written on top (each column).
First 5 samples: C what we identified in #Ayurveda #medicines
Antibiotics
Steroids (anabolic/synthetic)
#NARCOTICS - LSD, Morphine
Blood thinners (possible reason Y bleeding tests were off the roof in the patient)
Heavy metals!


5/
Next 5 samples (total 10 now)
Mercury is clear winner. Almost all samples
See controlled substances - Butyrolactones https://t.co/CPz0FwPEOm, methylamine https://t.co/OZnXY7U9UQ
Alcohols, industrial solvents
Rare metals - cobalt, lithium
Again lots of blood thinners
#Ayush
You gotta think about this one carefully!

Imagine you go to the doctor and get tested for a rare disease (only 1 in 10,000 people get it.)

The test is 99% effective in detecting both sick and healthy people.

Your test comes back positive.

Are you really sick? Explain below 👇

The most complete answer from every reply so far is from Dr. Lena. Thanks for taking the time and going through


You can get the answer using Bayes' theorem, but let's try to come up with it in a different —maybe more intuitive— way.

👇


Here is what we know:

- Out of 10,000 people, 1 is sick
- Out of 100 sick people, 99 test positive
- Out of 100 healthy people, 99 test negative

Assuming 1 million people take the test (including you):

- 100 of them are sick
- 999,900 of them are healthy

👇

Let's now test both groups, starting with the 100 people sick:

▫️ 99 of them will be diagnosed (correctly) as sick (99%)

▫️ 1 of them is going to be diagnosed (incorrectly) as healthy (1%)

👇
This is the $1mln question still without an answer: why were these workers cleaning bat guano from that abandoned mine?

Surprisingly we simply don't know.

China would have all interest in clarifying that point if for instance they were prospecting or selling guano. It did not.


What we know is that EcoHealth + WIV were sampling bat sites in the vicinity at the exact time of the workers being in that mine.

#DRASTIC wrote about this and about other oddities in the official story:

Maybe it's just one of these coincidences.

Then it gets interesting: about a year after the miners death, Olival & Epstein from EcoHealth Alliance co-authored a paper about the coronavirus risk infection from bat guano collection.

No mention of the

That paper oddly used some old bat samples collected by DARPA in 2006/7 at the famous Thai bat cave.

It never mentioned that the Thai monks have been doing this every Sunday for many many years without infection.

But most interestingly it never mentioned the Mojiang mine accident, even if the perfect timing and recycling of old DARPA bat samples seem to point to a likely knowledge of it.

Anyway, the idea was to ask for more money, as you correctly

You May Also Like