HDFC Bank - price bouncing back from the support must knock off the previous highs else it becomes weaker. Not a healthy sign till now. Need a strong follow-through. The zone of 1290-1300 is still to be tracked carefully.
More from The_Chartist 📈
Tata Elxsi - resting before the next move. Keep it on your radar. https://t.co/IooKK2EYpy
Tata Elxsi (W) - near to the resistance zone again 5th time. @nishkumar1977 @suru27 @rohanshah619 @indian_stockss @sanstocktrader @BissaGauravB @RajarshitaS @PAVLeader @Rishikesh_ADX @VijayThk @Investor_Mohit @TrendTrader85 @jitendra_stock pic.twitter.com/aIC5kO8XqA
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) December 18, 2020
We still haven't got any signal of negation in the private banks' index & if the bearish H&S top has to be negated, the index has to move past 19950. Till then, it will be considered a minor pullback
Nifty Private Bank https://t.co/BwG1DKhhLc
Nifty Private Bank https://t.co/BwG1DKhhLc
I am watching a big bearish H&S top building up in Nifty Private Bank Index. Any breakdown will result in increased volatility in respective charts. For traders - definitely not a spot to be in. The index has to move beyond 19900 to negate the pattern. pic.twitter.com/IGFeyNrtQV
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) June 19, 2022
More from Hdfcbank
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.