1. Military Intelligence contact continued:

. There were 300 arrests that took place yesterday Fri 11 Dec--that was one of the last pieces that needed to be put in place for the final release of the RV shotgun start--and that leads to the Insurrection Act possibly being...

2. ...invoked by POTUS (for military suppression of Deep State riots fomented by Antifa thugs), that leads to martial law (if necessary when people realize the vote fraud NEGATES A BIDEN PRESIDENCY & the Deep State tries to start RIOTS IN 18+ URBAN HOT SPOTS AROUND THE COUNTRY...
3. ... that have already been prepared with initial arrests and round-ups by Spec Op (SOF) military missions (black hawks carrying them);
. ALL THESE THINGS are TIED to NESARA / GESARA, to the restored Republic being organizationally and legally in place by Mon 21 Dec...
4. ... (POTUS TEAM'S LEGAL DEADLINE to get it done), and to COMMON LAW or CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (your post-RV CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM and your post-RV FINANCIAL FREEDOM to spend the money as YOU INTEND and NOT AS THE DEEP STATE GOVT wants to do to LOCK YOU DOWN, TAX 50%-70% of...
5. ... your post-RV funds, and to LIMIT YOU under DRACONIAN ECONOMIC LOCKDOWNS and SCAMDEMIC LOCKDOWNS while FORCING COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATES on you AGAINST YOUR WILL and against YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL & GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS >>NOT<< to HAVE TO TAKE A VACCINE--Trump will NOT...
6. ... ALLOW VACCINE MANDATES he said, Trump only wants to make the COVID-19 vaccine AVAILABLE in order to DEFANG and DISEMPOWER the Deep State's globalist agenda to force everyone to be vaccinated to travel or to do business;
[10:43 PM]
7. . He said do not worry about SCOTUS not taking on the TX lawsuit on the mountains of evidence of vote fraud in GA, PA, MI, WI—he said Trump IS NOT A LAME DUCK PRESIDENT because Trump will have a second term 20 Jan 2021 WHICH WE ALL NEED he said for our POST-RV FREEDOM—...
8. ... he said regarding the SCOTUS decision, The election fraud problem CONSTITUTIONALLY should be STOPPED & declared invalid by the state legislatures of GA, PA, MI,WI, etc—it is state legislatures that have the constitutional authority (Constitution Art 2 sec. 1.2 & 12th...
9. ... Amendment) to stop the fraud vote for Biden ONCE & FOR ALL at the House of Representatives vote on Wed 6 Jan, as Rep Mo Brooks (R-AL) and other Congress people (e.g., Sen Ron Johnson R-WI) have ALREADY said they would do thank God!—This chess game is far from over, no...
10. ... need AT ALL for Trump to concede, & Biden will be forced to watch Trump being inaugurated on 20 Jan 2021 as Biden is on his way to GITMO!...
11. ... Even Pelosi knew election contest could end this way (https://t.co/qWMPKytOWV )—all wrapped up in a bow & ribbon as a nice present for Christmas!!
12. Continued in next tweet...

More from 🇺🇸I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement🇺🇸

More from Government

Abbott is pushing a lie to protect incompetence. There is no Federal oversight of the Texas Grid, ergo fewer regulations (sound familiar) - so point one: state legislature needs reform. 2/


2. Point 2: there were clear signs the grid would get overloaded under extreme cold conditions. Why? Due to a vacuum of regulations mandating winterization of turbines and power generators. This from sources, in Texas!

3. Point 3: Of the power shortfall that hit Texas, over 80% was due to problems at coal and gas fired plants. Power generators were just not winterized. Decisions to do so have been ignored since the 1990s.

4. Point 4: these are winterized wind turbines in Denmark. The ocean is frozen. The turbines are generating.


5. #Texas| the main issue is: catastrophic governance at the State level (no Federal oversight of the Texas grid) failing to allocate funding to winterise the Natural Gas, Coal and Wind Turbine elements that contribute to the grid. (~ 80/20

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?