A vitally important thread. Much isnt new, but is so in the air we breathe we forget how RECENT it is & therefore how unaccustomed we r to coping w/it. At the risk of hijacking her great observatns, theyre pivotal to points others have made re: Institutional Evangelicalism...1/12
Popping back on briefly to share some insights on media consumption, spread of conspiracy theories, & epistemelogical divides.
— hannah anderson (@sometimesalight) January 12, 2021
This is not about politics. This is about our country, about the rule of law, and about the sanctity of human life. https://t.co/rYidlxRvfE
— Russell Moore (@drmoore) January 11, 2021
"Secularism is not the prodigal son who fled a good and loving home, it\u2019s the estranged spouse of evangelicalism\u2019s extramarital affair with individualism."
— Brad Edwards (@cbradedwards) September 8, 2020
This is a thesis that has been incubating since before the pandemic hit, but... (1/5)https://t.co/gD0IP58HVw
EXPANDED THREAD on the fracturing of evangelicalism:
— Michael S. Graham (@msgwrites) December 21, 2020
I keep thinking about what I\u2019m observing as I talk to other pastors & ministry leaders around the country and I think that evangelicalism is fracturing into at least 6 distinct groups:
1/14 pic.twitter.com/lR5xkApYn2
More from For later read
I was half kidding. I also assumed someone would think of what I did pretty quickly and waiting for the comment to mention what I assumed was obvious.
The timing. I was sure someone else had thought of it.
Columbia professor: I do heroin regularly for 'work-life balance' https://t.co/6aq9cnGfPG pic.twitter.com/3OmmaHKORx
— New York Post (@nypost) February 19, 2021
But no one did. 20+ comments in people discussed the morality or bad sense or libertarian perspectives. Someone even said I’m thinking about doing that. No one said what I thought was obvious. Have you thought of it? Is it obvious to you?
Here’s a clue...recognize it?

How about this?

The author discusses it with Mike Wallace in 1958