The mass arrests have to happen very soon. It's only logical.

Here are the 3 reasons... (a short thread) 👇

Es muss sein - Beethoven.

(1) Lin Wood, defamation lawyer who just won over half a billion dollars for his client, Nick Sandmann, saying Chief Justice John Roberts is guilty of human trafficking and Jeffrey Epstein is alive.

Do you really think a defamation lawyer would say this if it weren't true? 👇
And #LinWood is trending right now. 3x more tweets than #TimesSquare. 👇
(2) News is spreading that the Obama administration knowingly funded terror-linked organization. 👇

https://t.co/IniV7LmE7U
This is from a new report just released before Christmas from @ChuckGrassley -- Read it here: https://t.co/RmgwRl2hqm

Why is this important to our timeline? 👇
Kew told us the net would shut down when pics surface of Hussein holding an AK47. After that we will get the announcement from the Emergency Broadcast System. POTUS will be on AF1. What has @DanScavino been posting lately? 👇
Some recent posts from Dan... AF1 👇
(3) Vax being rolled out in US... but now lagging. I personally do not believe it will reach the general public. Not safe -- reports of Bells Palsy, deaths.

The arrests have to happen first.

Es muss sein!

https://t.co/IMy5Oyyndc
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from For later read

Hi @EdinburghUni @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk

The DIVERSITY INFORMATION section in yr job application mentions 'legal equality duties'. You then ask "What is your gender identity?" with options

Female
Male
Non-binary
Not-listed
Other

1/13


'Gender identity' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

2/13


Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology - 'non-binary' and 'other' are not valid options.

https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF

'Gender identity' is not a synonym for sex.

3/13


You then ask "Does your gender identity match your sex registered at birth?"

4/13


Again, 'gender identity' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

5/13
This response to my tweet is a common objection to targeted advertising.

@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.

Some counterpoints 👇


1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.

This does not seem self-evident to me


Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇

If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted

2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.

But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.

Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.

3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:

"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."

To

"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."

IMO the latter statement is incorrect.

You May Also Like