@GunduHuDuGa That's a good qsn, if not a bit nuanced. Avataras are of many varieties and frankly, most of the classification is only for our understanding and not really binding on Paramatma Himself. We can take several approaches to understanding this. If you go by a Vedantic approach,+

@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Avatara means that which descends from an exalted state (Taara). Going by Upanishadic observaton of Purnam adham purnam idham, every manifestation of Bhagavan is indeed wholesome. In fact, Avataras usually happen when Iswara is propitiated with certain qualities already+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa described in the Vedas by other Devatas. So, in order to please them, He assumes the form that best envisages the said Vaidika tatvam. For example, Varaha and Nrusimha avatars, though they have sthoola prayojanas, also exemplify the Tejovanna tatvam propounded by Upanishads.+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa All these tatvams ultimately emanate from Him so whatever form He takes is indeed Purna. Now, one may ask then if that's the case, why such a distinction had to be made in the first place. That is because of upasana vidhis and understanding of how Bhagavad tatvam shines+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa with each Leela being performed. Let's take Nrusimha avatar. The purpose of the avatar is neither to save Hiranyakasipu nor rescue Prahlada. For that He need not descend down as H's boons are applicable only for Brahman's creation and not Paramatma Himself.+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Real reason was elucidated by Vyasa Himself. Satyam vidhathum nija bruthyu bhashitham vyaptim cha bhutheshu akhileshu cha aatmanah. 1. To prove His devotees' words are true and 2. To establish His all-pervading nature. Since this is a quality of Vishnu, Nrusimha is a Purnavataram
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Now, coming to Vamana. Vamana, as Trivikrama, re-established the Vedic rik which says Treeni padaa vichakrame vishnu: gopa adhaa aabhya:. Because He showcased the truth in the Vedas, Vamana is also a Purnaavataram.
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Sri Raama is also a Purnaavatar. Though Raavana didn't seek protection from humans and vaanaras, no human could kill him although he did fear Kaartaveeryarjuna and Vaali. it required Bhagavad tatvam distilled in the form of human qualities to prove man is great.+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Even though Raama just says Aatmanaam maanusham manye Raamam Dasarataatmajam, other Devatas, Brahma, Shiva, and even Garuda extol His Paramatma nature. Besides, purpose of Raama avatar wasnt just Raavana vadha but also establishment of Dharma.+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa He ruled for 12k years and established Raama Rajya, which is nothing but rule as per Sastras, which is again a quality of Bhagavan, hence Sri Raama is also a Poornaavataram.+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Finally, coming to Sri Krishna.. in fact, on close observation, Krishna avatar is indeed Varaha avatar redux. The names Govinda, Krishna originally apply to Varaha. A beautiful verse by Leelasuka in Krishna Karnamrutam comes to mind +
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Yadromandra paripoorthi vidhava daksha
Varaha janmani bhabhuvuramee samudra |
Tam naama naadamaravindha drusham Yasoda
Paanidwayantara jalai snapayaam bhabhoova ||
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa During Varaha avatar, all the waters of the seas weren't enough to wet His hair follicles. Now, Yashoda is able to completely bathe Him with lotus eyes with just two palms of water.
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Each and every Leela of Krishna propounds an Upanishad truth. Narayana Teertha says Brindavanam is actually Bruhadaaranyam. Therefore, Krishna is not merely an Avatar but Bhagavan Swayam. All the individual truths propounded in earlier incarnations come alive in One.+
@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa Hence He is Pari-poorna. He is also an Avatara as He is Brahman in accessible form. Hope this helped. Sorry for the unduly long post :)

More from Johnny Silverhand

Haha. Fool. On the day of Deepavali Amavasya, abhyangana snaana, pitru tarpanam, deepa daanam, ulka darsanam, and Lakshmi puja are performed. Deepa daana is not some Buddhist creation. The concept of even the wicks in a Deepam is highly Vedic, so it is impossible that what is


essentially a naasitka vaada will even promulgate something about Deepam, let alone Deepa Daanam. It is that time of the year again — an auspicious occasion of Deepavali marked by festivities, exchange of pleasantries, sumptuous food, crackers! and of course, Bhagavan's blessings

However, this is also the time when a lot of misinfo, faltu gnaan, and unsolicited advice start pouring in from the usual suspects. I don't necessarily fault ThePrint or any such farcical media outlets. They are steadfast in their agenda and they won't change even if one moves

heaven and earth. However, it is important to call out blatant misappropriation for our own good and know why we celebrate certain festivals.

Let's understand what Deepavali is all about. Now, the festival means many things to many people and there are too many variations in how

it is celebrated across the world. That being said, I will try to present some aspects that form the core of it all.

As always, every festival, every act, and every ritual in SD is extensively deep-rooted in philosophy that addresses both iha and para.
Seriyana loosu. This is why I said Eelam activists are better off doing kuthu rap instead of worrying about whether Shiva is Vedic or not. Then these same people say Om Namah Shivaya. Adding Om and Nama: automatically makes it a mantra.

**Long thread alert**


Mantras are only found in Vedas, not in the common tongue. Anyways, her perspectives matter zilch. What is more alarming is how a proper Thirumurai vakyam such as Anbe Sivam is being twisted and appropriated for nefarious agendas and how SM is brazenly peddling the same nonsense.

Yasya nishvasitam Vedaa: yo vedebhyo akhilam jagat | Nirmame tam aham vande vidyaatirtha Maheshvaram ||
One Whose very breath is the Veda using which the entire Creation was made, I bow down to Maheswara Who purifies with His wisdom.
So, if Vedas are really His own breath, how

can one draw stupid faux ethnic identities denying His indication in the Vedas? This has no rationale even to the self-proclaimed rationalists.

Let's attempt to understand what the naama Shiva means. I believe this foundation is important before we go on to understand any Naama vaibhavam. Do note that in SD, the Naama and the Naami are indifferent. In fact, Bhaktas consider the Naama to be greater since

More from All

How can we use language supervision to learn better visual representations for robotics?

Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!

Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z

🧵👇(1 / 12)


Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.

Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)

The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (
https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).

The secret is *balance* (3/12)

Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:

1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.

2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)

By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.

Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)

You May Also Like