![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eo9fyP0VQAA9w6F.jpg)
Gematria on PURIFICATION TIME: Take a look, thanks @SPACEX25587506 https://t.co/93iDCciyyB
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video_thumb/Eo9g41UUcAA1yec.jpg)
PuRiFiCaTiOn \u26aa\ufe0f TiMe........................................................................
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 11, 2020
............................................................................................. ... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/wFBsTQwJEX
More from 🌹⚜️ ⚔️𝒮𝒽𝑒𝓀𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒽 ⚔️ ⚜️ 🌹
https://t.co/Bs10hlT4wN
https://t.co/GuJqBTnQSh
https://t.co/Mqo4XOdNJR
https://t.co/73nJO8ZpxQ
Divine!! pic.twitter.com/85eQjQsBMG
— \U0001f339\u269c\ufe0f \u2694\ufe0f \U0001d4ae\U0001d4bd\U0001d452\U0001d4c0\U0001d4bd\U0001d4be\U0001d4c3\U0001d4b6\U0001d4bd \u2694\ufe0f \u269c\ufe0f \U0001f339 (@PetahJane) January 2, 2021
He is!!
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEWPhVEAAg8YC.jpg)
Trust the plan!!
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEW1NU0AYLWmp.jpg)
https://t.co/8TW43LNdJo
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEXYIUwAA3mBR.jpg)
https://t.co/Ee6Iddislv
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEX56UcAEUpKQ.jpg)
There\u2019s a lotta pain coming my friend
— \U0001f339\u269c\ufe0f \u2694\ufe0f\U0001d4ae\U0001d4bd\U0001d452\U0001d4c0\U0001d4bd\U0001d4be\U0001d4c3\U0001d4b6\U0001d4bd \u2694\ufe0f \u269c\ufe0f \U0001f339 (@PetahJane) November 29, 2020
Ts 3:32 29.11.2920
33 22 9 11 22
33 22<911>22
\U0001f446 seen this pattern 3 times now
33 > Christ
22 > Balance
911 > Jesus birthday
22 > Balance
The message here: Christ will return and when he does, the balance lost is restored \U0001f64f\U0001f3fb\u2764\ufe0f
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2UkVVgAEFa2z.jpg)
\U0001f4a5INdiGO ASCenSiON\U0001f4a5..........................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 29, 2020
\U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5..................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/dW24cc8ruv
https://t.co/ZbgjDhcpan
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2VKhUcAIcXAU.jpg)
https://t.co/upLLPuIKSa
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2V2hVQAQa3ZA.jpg)
God walks amongst us
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2WmzUUAARbYm.jpg)
https://t.co/kSibLgVNDk
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2XawUcAQKGP-.jpg)
More from For later read
@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.
Some counterpoints 👇
That targeted ads allow for "free" products for consumers is a common talking point and we're going to see more of it in the coming months.: https://t.co/Xty3My3f0u (1/14)
— Kevin Coates (@KevinCoates) February 16, 2021
1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.
This does not seem self-evident to me
Great post by @Sherman1890 got me thinking about the future of targeted ads.
— Dirk Auer (@AuerDirk) February 12, 2021
More and more tools (privacy labels, ad blockers, GDPR) enable consumers to opt-out from targeted ads - can limit the data platforms receive or block ads altogether.
The end of targeted ads? \U0001f9f5\U0001f447 https://t.co/MA6A3BrUWq
Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇
If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted
2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.
But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.
Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.
3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:
"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."
To
"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."
IMO the latter statement is incorrect.
This is an excellent report, and I'm glad to have joined the study group. The central focus on avoiding war is understandable--a US-China war would be catastrophic and should be avoided. But protecting Taiwan's security and prosperity requires doing more. 1/x https://t.co/P0Sg4LJcpV
— Bonnie Glaser / \u845b\u4f86\u5100 (@BonnieGlaser) February 12, 2021
Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think it’s key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/
BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/
The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/
Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/