What do a Tory Peer, Selwyn Gummer (Lord Chadlington), David Sumner ( Sumner Group Holdings) and the Sanchez Perez family (drugs money, laundered through Gold mines) have in common?

It’s another company-saving a £50 million PPE contract shaggy dog story

Connections, connections

What a start to the story

“A bulletproof truck trundled down the road in downtown Lima, guarded by 18 policeman
They were wearing body armour & wielding high velocity rifles

No-one was taking any chances
This was a Special delivery for Peruvian Prosecutor for an anti drug trial
That was in 2011, the same year that Lord Chadlington’s daughter got married in Chadlington to Henry Allsopp.

Who was there?
Yes Kirstie Allsopp of Location, location, location and all this Covid nonsense fame) is his sister

Camilla, his Godmother

Jeremy Hunt

Cameron
Well. Come on. Lord Chadlington had been chair of the local Witney Conservative Association. It’s only fair.

Hang on. Julian Wheatland, Director of SCL Group/ Cambridge Analytica had also been chair of Witney Conservative Association...and campaigned for his mate Cameron
Are we sure Julian Wheatland and his side kick Alexander Nix were not there too @JolyonMaugham ?

I mean. They move in the same North Oxford circles.
Anyway.

Back to
-the Cotswold connection,

-Sumner Group Holdings with a history of financial crashes and

-that pesky Sanchez Paredes / Perez family with those lovely gold mines allegedly handy for laundering drug money.
What’s that got to do with Lord Chadlington?

Well his firm, GPW (he was chairman & Director) was asked by David Sumner to produce a business intelligence report on the risks of Sumner Group Holdings Ltd doing business with the Sanchez Peredes/ Perez family.
It concluded that although Orlando Sanchez Peredes had not been not convicted of any money laundering crimes, nor appear on any law enforcement sanctions list he WAS listed as a “special interest person” by the Dow Jones register of business risk data..and was currently on trial
4 members of the same family also under investigation for drugs/ money laundering through the gold mines offences.

So SGH ran a mile, surely?

Nope
They bought into the mines, paying Orlando Sanchez Perez and his family a shedload of money.

Then floated SGH on the stock market
They had already paid £10 million to the Sanchez family as a down payment with a £32 million still to pay.

Someone with some sense in SGH decided that continuing to do business with the Sanchez family still on trial, was too big a risk, waving goodbye to the £10 million.
Naturally, the newly SGH recruited shareholders were not too happy and sued them.

Knowing all this Lord Chadlington wouldn’t touch them with a barge pole, would he?

Nope.

He ended up the company Chairman.
So whilst SGH mining company ran into trouble with it shareholder, the public money purse this Government seems to use to line the coffers of its mates sprang to the rescue with 2 PPE contract (£23.8 mill + £26.1 mill) awarded to another SGH subsidiary.
Where’s the problem between mates with a company with £376k debt, after all?

I mean, that’s what mates and that VIP line to success are for, surely ?
Interesting colleagues on the Sumner board.

https://t.co/qcJVOm2Lfp
That 28 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey registered address rings a bell with me.

Does it you @Turloughc ?
The full SGH/ Lord Chadlington/ Sanchez Peredes story is here

https://t.co/GQoj8P0HpS

More from Economy

1/ To add a little texture to @NickHanauer's thread, it's important to recognize that there's a good reason why orthodox economists (& economic cosplayers) so vehemently oppose a $15 min wage:

The min wage is a wedge that threatens to undermine all of orthodox economic theory.


2/ Orthodox economics is grounded in two fundamental models: a systems model that describes the market as a closed equilibrium system, and a behavioral model that describes humans as rational, self-interested utility-maximizers. The modern min wage debate undermines both models.

3/ The assertion that a min wage kills jobs is so central to orthodox economics that it is often used as the textbook example of the Supply/Demand curve. Raise the cost of labor and businesses will buy less of it. It's literally Econ 101!


4/ Econ 101 insists that markets automatically set an efficient "equilibrium price" for labor & everything else. Mess with this price and bad things happen. Yet decades of empirical research has persuaded a majority of economists that this just isn't

5/ How can this be? Well, either the market is not a closed equilibrium system in which if you raise the price of labor employers automatically purchase less of it... OR the market is not automatically setting an efficient and fair equilibrium wage. Or maybe both. #FAIL

You May Also Like

Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to


Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.

Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.

Mueller's team was 100% partisan.

That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election

They looked high.

They looked low.

They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.

And they found...NOTHING.

Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.

What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?

THERE WEREN'T ANY.

Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.