Lal Pathlabs - Updated chart. After completing the target of CnH at 3960, the stock consolidated further in a rectangle and broke out further for a target of 4340. A strong stock will keep on consolidating in middle during an upward journey. https://t.co/vDxOM9Xh8O
Lal Path Labs - IH&S can also be a continuation pattern. The stock is in a constant uptrend. You should always be biased for a 'buy' in these counters.
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) August 4, 2021
Two consecutive Double top buys in PnF 1%*3 Box size and reversal.
D: holding in the investment portfolio. pic.twitter.com/ckvJXHg2hy
More from The_Chartist 📈
Reminded me of my Borosil renewables chart of last year in July.
AWL - look at the ranges of contraction on the chart https://t.co/2XMhqZQu8X
AWL - look at the ranges of contraction on the chart https://t.co/2XMhqZQu8X
Borosil Renewables - Patterns like these must be looked at carefully and must be kept on the radar. Herein price is contracting which generally signifies shifting of hands (from weak to strong). If you go wrong, the risk is limited in these. pic.twitter.com/iqyoeslZjy
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) July 12, 2021
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
