More from Steve Nison
1. A Book written by Sir @Prashantshah267 as attached
2. Research paper by @MebFaber April 2010
3. A book written by Sir Robert A. Levy as attached
4. Webinar by Sir @premalparekh with @vivbajaj
5. Video by @jfahmy on YT https://t.co/xg4fe09ImL

Hi sir ..can u post some articles or write up on relative strength ,how to use same and what is the criteria .. kindly help
— Nanda (@vk_nandagopal) December 11, 2021
although a must-have portfolio stock. Faced resistance right at the upper channel boundary. Volumes high. Any retracement back to the lower boundary will be an opportunity to accumulate. https://t.co/5uDsUXsbPP

IEX - the resistance turning support. Kindly review, please. @nishkumar1977 @suru27 @rohanshah619 @indian_stockss @sanstocktrader @BissaGauravB @RajarshitaS @PAVLeader @Rishikesh_ADX @VijayThk @Investor_Mohit @TrendTrader85 pic.twitter.com/7CCzmee5If
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) December 18, 2020
USDINR - a breakout that will not bode well for the equities
78+ https://t.co/AWqZxF5B1L

Can you anticipate a breakout? Yes
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) June 10, 2022
the attached tweet.
now the chart is for USDINR https://t.co/Vb2wKaCvTB pic.twitter.com/INo0GC4fGY
This exercise will tell you about your inherent strengths & weaknesses. 👇👇
How to record a trading journal (TJ) & what to analyze?
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) December 14, 2021
What is in a TJ?
Buy Date
Stock Name
The time frame you analyzed (D/W/M)
Long/Short?
Buy Price
SL
Sell Price
Risk took (% of capital)
Sell date
No. of days held
P/L
P/L as % of capital
Buy Reason?
Invested capital/trade pic.twitter.com/WnrvmYuOV0
More from Syngene
You May Also Like
The question is:
Is this an official account for Bahcesehir Uni (Bau)?

Bahcesehir Uni, BAU has an official website https://t.co/ztzX6uj34V which links to their social media, leading to their Twitter account @Bahcesehir
BAU’s official Twitter account

BAU has many departments, which all have separate accounts. Nowhere among them did I find @BAUDEGS
@BAUOrganization @ApplyBAU @adayBAU @BAUAlumniCenter @bahcesehirfbe @baufens @CyprusBau @bauiisbf @bauglobal @bahcesehirebe @BAUintBatumi @BAUiletisim @BAUSaglik @bauebf @TIPBAU
Nowhere among them was @BAUDEGS to find

As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x