#DIVISLAB
If it gives a closing below 3788.95, then it's a slippery slope ahead towards the marked levels on chart.
#StocksToWatch
More from Gurleen
#KOTAKBANK Update
Midway resistances held up strong.
Once these are breached, It is poised for more towards 1950 followed by 2000.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/kswtnvjQM8
Midway resistances held up strong.
Once these are breached, It is poised for more towards 1950 followed by 2000.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/kswtnvjQM8
#KOTAKBANK
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 8, 2021
In daily; Trendline breakout along with price volume action.
Resistances midway at 1812.70 and 1856.75.
Once these are breached, It is poised for more towards 1950 followed by 2000.
In weekly as well; Setup looks quite bullish. #StockMarket #StocksToTrade pic.twitter.com/vfIjR7MuCE
#LAURUSLABS Update
Into a narrow consolidation band post breakout.
Sustained above the zone, Target's intact.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/lhfemwd4iQ
Into a narrow consolidation band post breakout.
Sustained above the zone, Target's intact.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/lhfemwd4iQ
#LAURUSLABS Multiple TF Analysis
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 9, 2021
A break-through at ATH.
Sustenance above 698 and a breakout at 705.85 would bring in higher targets of 733 followed by 800 in short term. #StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/2aaY3BG99D
More from Divislongterm
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
