Research shows how affective–discursive practices are employed to create gateways to radicalization and ideologically motivated violence.
Far-right parties are currently gaining momentum & exerting parliamentary influence in diverse countries such as the UK, Hungary, the USA, Austria, Sweden, Germany, & Denmark.
Far-right terrorism has increased dramatically.
We ignore this at our
Research shows how affective–discursive practices are employed to create gateways to radicalization and ideologically motivated violence.
The collective Nazi mind comprised hatred of women, fear of sexuality, & a desire for homosocial belonging, as well as a lust for ritual violence.
For example, the Nordic Resistance Movement (Nordiska Motståndsrörelsen) recontextualizes the myth in propaganda texts and leaflets targeting new members.
This helps understand the appeal & growth of Populist Nationalism here in the UK & elsewhere.
#Palingenesis means “rebirth from the ashes” therefore urges a revolutionary overthrow of the social system that is regarded as the threat against “our nation & race.”
In a scrutiny of British fascism, Richardson characterizes fascist discourse as follows:
ALWAYS.
Can you see how this fits what's happening in the USA yet?
Seeing shades of the Brexit debate yet? New 'Global Britain'?
1. Your daughters, mothers & sisters are being raped & humiliated.
2. Your sons, fathers & brothers are being assaulted and mocked.
3. Drugs are being spread to our children.
5. What do members of a people do when their country is being colonized by a never-ending horde of race strangers?
6. Indigenous culture & healthy values are being openly intimidated, mocked and degraded.
8. Celebrities & corporate leaders cheer the perdition in order to maximize their profits.
9. What do we do when the media is completely controlled by people hostile elements?
11. All govt institutions are working on the side of the enemy of the people & are against us
13. Corrupt politicians are one of the actors in the game.
15. It is your passivity that makes this possible. Why don’t you do something about it?
16. It is you who is allowing this to happen. Why don’t you act?
19. You face a fundamental choice. A life in which you either deceive yourself and continue to live in comfort or an honest and straight-backed life of struggle!
The myth of #palingenesis (rebirth from the ashes) develops from the trope of chaos to the trope of the new dawn.
23. Dark times may lie ahead of us, but if the only way forward is through hell then, yes, we have to pave that way and fight everything than blocks our way.
The far-right value hyper-masculinity & deploy the trope of the brave, masculine fascist - the heroic few destined to save the nation.
28. This involves responsibility, sacrifice, risks, stigmatization & hard work - blood, sweat & tears: Proud & honest, unselfish & heroic, determining the destiny of our entire race.
Feeling pride implicitly involves a realization of the ideals that define the faults & errors that cause us to feel ashamed.
It compels the reader to partake in revolution by construing hope as being embodied in their future actions.
Contemporary recruitment propaganda appear to be interdiscursively linked with the affective–discursive practices of historical Nazism.
For example, hope as being integral to feminism, & fear & hate as being integral to nationalism & racism.
However...
Firstly, the affective script prompted by the far-right resonates with those affects offered by other political, social & religious movements eg by shaming recruits as a means of returning to both hope & pride.
What is meant by this?
More from Culture
Best books I read in 2020
1. Atomic Habits by @JamesClear
“If you show up at the gym 5 days in a row—even for 2 minutes—you're casting votes for your new identity. You’re not worried about getting in shape. Youre focused on becoming the type of person who doesn’t miss workouts”
Good Reasons for Bad Feelings
https://t.co/KZDqte19nG
2. “social anxiety is overwhelmingly common. Natural selection shaped us to care enormously what other people think..We constantly monitor how much others value us..Low self-esteem is a signal to try harder to please others”
The True Believer by Eric Hoffer
https://t.co/uZT4kdhzvZ
“Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents...Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without a believe in a devil.”
Grandstanding
https://t.co/4Of58AZUj8
"if politics becomes a morality pageant, then the contestants have an incentive to keep problems intact...politics becomes a forum to show off moral qualities...people will be dedicated to activism for its own sake, as a vehicle to preen"
Warriors and Worriers by Joyce Benenson
https://t.co/yLC4eGHEd4
“Across diverse cultures, a man who lives in the house with another man’s children is about 60 times more likely than the biological father to kill those children.”
1. Atomic Habits by @JamesClear
“If you show up at the gym 5 days in a row—even for 2 minutes—you're casting votes for your new identity. You’re not worried about getting in shape. Youre focused on becoming the type of person who doesn’t miss workouts”
Good Reasons for Bad Feelings
https://t.co/KZDqte19nG
2. “social anxiety is overwhelmingly common. Natural selection shaped us to care enormously what other people think..We constantly monitor how much others value us..Low self-esteem is a signal to try harder to please others”
The True Believer by Eric Hoffer
https://t.co/uZT4kdhzvZ
“Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents...Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without a believe in a devil.”
Grandstanding
https://t.co/4Of58AZUj8
"if politics becomes a morality pageant, then the contestants have an incentive to keep problems intact...politics becomes a forum to show off moral qualities...people will be dedicated to activism for its own sake, as a vehicle to preen"
Warriors and Worriers by Joyce Benenson
https://t.co/yLC4eGHEd4
“Across diverse cultures, a man who lives in the house with another man’s children is about 60 times more likely than the biological father to kill those children.”
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?