Until @realDonaldTrump came into politics, every time a Republican was confronted by one of these rules, they rolled over and showed their soft bellies as they waved the white flag.
đź§µTHREADđź§µ
So, I'm on a another platform with some very smart people that apparently got Jack's goat over the years, and late last night, I got a crazy idea.
The idiot shitlibs have been, with varying degrees of effectiveness, using a basic rulebook since the early 1970s.
Until @realDonaldTrump came into politics, every time a Republican was confronted by one of these rules, they rolled over and showed their soft bellies as they waved the white flag.
Here in the next tweets, I'm going to go over the "rules" and how Trump has broken, subverted, or appropriated their rules to beat them at their own game.
Trump's answer: This is straight out of the "Art of War": Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.
Interesting dichotomy, isn't it?
By refusing to acknowledge Trump's power, the Democrats think that they are winning when really, they set themselves up for pain.
Trump takes this rule and lives it.
If you wonder why there is so much turnover in his administration, it's because he hires people for specific missions.
If you finish the job or can't, then you leave.
Do you notice how he talks about some of them?
“If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant”
That last point falls right into this one.
Trump is a businessman FIRST and foremost.
Most politicians, especially those on the left, couldn't run a Dairy Queen during the lunch rush.
So, for this rule, the Democrats actually ignores their own rule, and Trump embraces it.
Trump's answer?
Make EVERYONE live up to the rule of law.
No separate books, no double standards.
Every time the left has tried to make him "guilty" in the GOP's book, his response?
"You wrote the laws this way."
We covered this earlier, because this goes perfectly with "The Art of War":
This is where Alinsky proves that a blind squirrel can find a nut every once in a while, and Trump uses this to his advantage with mean tweets.
Trump rallies with chants of "Lock Her Up!"
Enough said, and another rule that Trump has appropriated from the enemy.
Trump knows this as well as anyone, hence why, under normal circumstances, his administration often has multiple irons in the fire at any given time.
Even with many balls in the air, Trump will still focus in on a problem, issue, or person.
He doesn't forget or forgive, he gets even.
This rule only works with an enemy who is showing their hand and trying to look powerful.
Trump always understates the threat.
By feigning weakness, he leads the enemy straight to the trap.
Again, Trump works best when his enemies lead themselves into a honey trap.
So many times during this administration...
Oops...
This is why the left tries to pin what BLM and Antifa do on the Proud Boys and Trump supporters.
This is why the left screams that Trump doesn't have a plan whenever he says he is about to do something.
They want THEIR plan to be implemented.
More from Culture
You May Also Like
Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.
After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year
as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.
After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year
as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?