Categories Crypto
I came across a few posts which I found immensely thought-provoking by @cburniske @RaoulGMI @DegenSpartan (see below):
2/
https://t.co/xztuB0Tfd5
https://t.co/670x6ErykB
https://t.co/1xEba2Usjk
I think the general CT community / retail are super bullish on crypto in general right now and rightfully so. The narratives I hear are: 1) Institutions are coming in, 2) money printing goes brrrr and
1/ The euphoria is intoxicating, but #crypto is in need of a pullback and consolidation if $BTC wants to reach into the $100Ks and $ETH into the mid-to-high thousands.
— Chris Burniske (@cburniske) January 6, 2021
3/ 3) US gov transition is +ve for crypto.
While I agree in general with these 3 narratives, I want to also be mindful of time horizons of those narratives and the scale / magnitude / speed of which those play out.
4/ 1st - let's look at @cburniske post on the concerns of the over-frothy sentiment in the last several weeks in crypto. I share that same concern and try to balance this out ongoingly with Wall Street's famous phrase "climbing the wall of worry".
5/ Crypto is generally a pretty illiquid market (from an institutional perspective), whale traders pump and dump all the time on a day-to-day / week-by-week basis
This thread is as predictable as you\u2019d expect: lots of replies handwaving about \u201cinnovation\u201d and \u201cblockchain\u201d, while ignoring that \u2018stablecoin\u2019 is just another word for payments infra.
— Angus Champion de Crespigny (@anguschampion) December 4, 2020
People get so caught up in the tech they don\u2019t realise the ultimate result is the same. https://t.co/OC2auSh0uX
Posing the question that way implies that there are only two options: (1) Fintech PSPs aren't banks, and therefore shouldn't have to get stnd. bank charters or abide by the reg's that go w/ such to gain access to public settlement facilities. That's what many stablecoin fans say.
(2) fintech PSPs are banks; and therefore must be get bank charters and be subject to the same regulations ordinary banks must abide by. That's the answer offered by the STABLE Act
The second answer relies, not unreasonably, on the standard regulatory definition of a bank as a "deposit taking" institution. But IMHO it's that definition that's problematic, and that renders the conventional bank-nonbank dichotomy so.
For conventional banks aren't just "deposit taking institutions." They combine deposit taking with lending. It's this combined set of activities, not deposit taking per se, that (rightly or wrongly) supplies the rationale for many bank regulations, including deposit insurance.
Ah yes, New Year's Eve. A time to reflect, look forward, celebrate, and throwback Long Reads Sunday style with the BEST BITCOIN TWEETS OF 2020.
Strap TF in, it's time for a thread!
šššš
2) Let's start by going back to February.
Even before the full impact of COVID-19 kicked in, bitcoiners were thinking big about the epoch shifts we were in the midst
Welcome to the Fourth Turning. At this time, we have entered the "crisis stage" as defined by the generational shift currently in progress. Boomers are retiring, handing the reins to Gen-X, and Millennials are entering their wage-earning years. Let's look at some data.
— Hans HODL (@hansthered) February 22, 2020
3) When the markets DID start to finally react, bitcoiners were quick off the draw to point out that, whatever the risk the virus posed, the economic threat was significantly predetermined by fragility borne of decades of decisions.
THIS ISN\u2019T #coronavirus!!! \U0001f62cThis is result of ~50 yrs of Western economies consuming more than they produced, finally coming home to roost. The virus was just the pin that pricked the debt bubble & revealed the magnitude of the solvency problem. Stay safe out there \U0001f64f
— Caitlin Long \U0001f511 (@CaitlinLong_) March 9, 2020
4) Focus quickly shifted to a global dollar shortage and what it might mean across industries - The "Dollar Wrecking Ball" as @RaoulGMI put it.
Just an update from me, in case you are interested...
— Raoul Pal (@RaoulGMI) March 18, 2020
Ive just closed all short positions in equities, oil and HYG and had closed bonds a while ago. I am now 100% focussed on the on the US dollar, which is a wrecking ball.
1/
5) As every market (including BTC) crashed on the infamous March "Black Thursday," Coinbase buying told a story that would be persistent throughout the year - the bitcoin community scooping underpriced corn as others fled to
HUGELY bullish dynamics for Bitcoin right now:
— Hunter Horsley (@HHorsley) March 18, 2020
- BTC flat during HISTORIC risk-off days in markets.
- 72% on Coinbase buying.
- The Halvening is 50 days away.
- Billions in buys coming when levered longs return.
- And if 1% of >$2T+ of stimulus finds its way to Bitcoin...
Olivier, I tried to reach out, and proposed to meet in person pre-fork to collaboratively discuss and write notes, on the economic & tech case for bitcoin with you, @rogerkver & a few others. You suddenly stopped responding. I think you'd be a lot richer if you had gone ahead.
— Adam Back (@adam3us) January 10, 2021
@tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver Once we establish the fact that non-mining full nudes are not required, which I have discussed with you for years (and you still fail to recognize), we can talk about the effects you caused and will cause by refusing to increase the blocksize limit.
@tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver Ridiculous transaction fees: - Noone will use Bitcoin as a currency for payments. Those who did, ditched it (Steam, etc). Bitcoin is a P2P electronic cash system (title of whitepaper), not just a atore of value. - People now have to resort to using centralized exchanges.
@tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver - Bitcoin was designed to simply and easily increase the blocksize limit. It was actually 1 line in the code and was absurdly easily changed (compared to Segwit, dont get me started). Satoshi put the limit in place as a temporary fix for a ddos issue (prove me wrong, I was there)
@tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver - You and a couple of co-conspirators wanted the limit to stay in place. From Blockstreams business perspective, that makes total sense. From an end-useds perspective, you screwed everyone. I fought and convinced miners/companies to remove the limit. They agreed. You stopped it.