#DEEPAKNITRITE Update
2150 📍
On weekly log scale; The trend remains intact towards the upside. Next up would be 2340.
[As mentioned; this can be in one's long term portfolio, Targets would keep on becoming elongated.]
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus #investing https://t.co/HJH5XwMRf5
#DEEPAKNITRITE Update
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 30, 2021
Reclaimed ATH and fresh at 2052.90
Came up with Great numbers and this can be in one's portfolio for long term. #StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/dMWyf013Nt pic.twitter.com/vxV6c0Eskp
More from Gurleen
More from Deepaknitrate
Even though bus was missed , I feel delighted bcoz I followed the #process
#Deepakntr Super Pattern after a brief consolidation at ATH.
— Aditya Shyam Jalan (@Aditya_Jalan_3) July 7, 2021
Count clusters till two decimal points.@srvithal388 @flyingvikas129 pic.twitter.com/5SFLEmz0Ia
#DeepakNtr - Can this be a Runway Gap and remain unfilled for some time going forward?
— VVikas Kumaarr (@flyingvikas129) July 31, 2021
Only market knows the right Answer.#flyingvikas #technical #nse #trading #Keepitsimple#Cadlestick #Gap #Breakout #BREAKOUTSTOCKS #stokes #trading pic.twitter.com/VFjbwGl0kD
Explained you same concept with Elxsi. The real test of a strong Breakout is that the big hand will not give you another chance to buy the share at the breakout level. They will absorb all the selling of weak hands. I mean "STRONG breakout". https://t.co/7fxFqGQl3p
Tata Elxsi ---
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) June 30, 2021
In the last 10 minutes, all the selling was absorbed despite intraday positions being squared off (if not converted). will wait for the EOD data. However, the chart structure is extremely strong. https://t.co/pci7GCDBEO pic.twitter.com/1NBD9V3mKc
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?