#DEEPAKNITRITE Update
2150 📍
On weekly log scale; The trend remains intact towards the upside. Next up would be 2340.
[As mentioned; this can be in one's long term portfolio, Targets would keep on becoming elongated.]
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus #investing https://t.co/HJH5XwMRf5
#DEEPAKNITRITE Update
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 30, 2021
Reclaimed ATH and fresh at 2052.90
Came up with Great numbers and this can be in one's portfolio for long term. #StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/dMWyf013Nt pic.twitter.com/vxV6c0Eskp
More from Gurleen
Into a narrow consolidation band post breakout.
Sustained above the zone, Target's intact.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/lhfemwd4iQ
#LAURUSLABS Multiple TF Analysis
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 9, 2021
A break-through at ATH.
Sustenance above 698 and a breakout at 705.85 would bring in higher targets of 733 followed by 800 in short term. #StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/2aaY3BG99D
More from Deepaknitrate
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 2189.89 daily close on 1% Box Size Chart. https://t.co/dEAqzILJj4
DEEPAKNTR
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) March 30, 2021
Double Top Buy & ABC Breakout above 1608.64 daily close on 1% Box size chart & Double Top Buy active on 3% Box size chart.
2000 Coming! https://t.co/ifywtsGM0S pic.twitter.com/VM7TneVwOr
Talking Point | Deepak Nitrite's Q1 results surpassed estimates led by margin improvement in Phenolics & basic chemicals segment. Is this trend sustainable? @_nirajshah in conversation with CEO Maulik Mehta. #BQLive https://t.co/347UDSefds
— BloombergQuint (@BloombergQuint) August 6, 2021
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x