Okay, as my discussion with @rahulroushan, an excerpt of which was tweeted by @digikarma, has triggered yet another debate on beef, I feel I must pitch in with my 2 paisa fwiw. (1/10)

As I clarified in the podcast, not eating beef is a non-negotiable as far as I am concerned, no questions asked. It is absolutely not allowed for Hindus in this yuga. (2/10)
However, I like to take the debate away from the religious to the political for two reasons. One, there is no practical method available to throw out from H society those who do not comply with this requirement. (3/10)
So, if you can't excommunicate a beef eater as modern H society has simply lost all coercive power over the unhinged individual, what good is getting indignant on Twitter about this degeneracy? It is better to work towards a national legislation banning beef incl export (4/10)
Two, quoting Vedas/Upanishads is a double-edged sword because there seem to be many places where beef-eating has been described. I am not a sanskritist, but many H scholars mention this. (5/10)
Those who quote the Vedas against beef- eating often force-fit the inconvenient verses to match their views. As I am not a scholar, I am not qualified to have an independent opinion but rely on the authority of the scholars. (6/10)
That said, to me it does not matter whether people ate beef in Vedic times or not. My living religious tradition does not allow it and that suffices for me. (7/10)
But there are many who quote the Vedas to justify beef eating. Since I am in no position to debate with them, I prefer the political argument of beef issue being symbolic of H resistance. (8/10)
I choose the political argument not because i am shy of the religious rationale, but because it is difficult to explain to a beef loving political Hindu that what we practice today is not necessarily quotable from the Vedas. (9/10)
This opens up a Pandora's box about whether Shruti is to us what Bible is to the Xtians - a book of commandments. That is a discussion I am simply not interested in because I believe it should be self-evident to any sincere Hindu. (10/10)

More from Business

You May Also Like

First thread of the year because I have time during MCO. As requested, a thread on the gods and spirits of Malay folk religion. Some are indigenous, some are of Indian origin, some have Islamic


Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits

Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their


Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time

Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods