This is way faster than I had thought. At 3170.
#APOLLOHOSP @ 2110 - Long Term Chart.
— Piyush Chaudhry (@piyushchaudhry) November 12, 2020
I see a fair possibility of the stock rising to 3500-5000 zone over next few years and an open possibility of the next zone of 5000-7500 as well.
Invalidation on break below Blue TL. pic.twitter.com/QJ5aY4eTT8
More from Piyush Chaudhry
This is how to differentiate:
• if right shoulder is smaller than left, most likely a continuation H&S
• if right is same or higher than left, and the price is not coming to neckline, most likely CF
sir a doubt does head & shoulders work in down trend ? pic.twitter.com/dytYmbzOfp
— Vega_Greek (@VegaGreek) May 13, 2021
#NIFTY in Regression Channel.
— Piyush Chaudhry (@piyushchaudhry) April 30, 2022
A rectangular consolidation around the central Line of Best Fit, with no such reversal characteristics on display yet.
For it to revisit the upper band, odds would increase only on a break above ~17450.
Else, it's a slippery slope. pic.twitter.com/4OT7JM1TJY
More from Apollohospitals
You May Also Like
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x